Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : INTERFACE SYSTEMS (INTF) GETTING INTO EBPP? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TLindt who wrote (535)	11/11/1999 10:07:00 PM
From: Tom Klempay	Respond to of 1203

I ended up picking up some 10's, 13's, and 15's for my IRA. Not a big swing, but enough to get started. -tk

To: TLindt who wrote (535)	11/11/1999 10:32:00 PM
From: David H. Zimmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1203

There is so much of this stock that is now closely held, several other managers that understand what you told me about initially, that swings of four to six points are viable. That will shake the weak of heart into selling just to "ease the pain" of the ups and downs. TMWD is a good example of where INTF is heading. You have to become a razorblade factory to make money in the internet and Nero had the vision and is able to execute. What impresses the hell out of me is that Nero has been able to reshape this company without the benefit of a cash laden IPO. Them that are coming on board are doing so for the future payoff -- options. These options are not as cheap as they used to be but that has not been discouraging to the newly hired and the soon to be hired. Imagine that, 4.5 million shares, less than 1/3 outstanding than the number that TMWD has, with first quarter revenues on their way. No debt, solid customer base within which to "switch" sell tothe client's needs and a Michigan-based workforce that doesn't need an arm and a leg to live. Fiscal responsibility in the internet workplace -- you've gotta love it. Now all we need is the rest of the investing public to understand what we already know.

To: TLindt who wrote (535)	12/16/1999 12:30:00 AM
From: TLindt	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1203

>>>I'm guessing it bases at 14 and dips to 12 just on the chart. Got that right....makes up for missing some of that CKFR move. MACD still hasn't turned over from when I stopped trading. BCE Emergis news was some driving stuff...because that's Canada, but it didn't go anywhere. I just can't find any Just-In-Time/INTF ties...which would tie this to Spectrum. Even though it's been mentioned....along with Europe trips with IBM/MSFT which should eventually bear fruit. I'm trying to time a bottom re-entry here.....I just don't see it yet. But I'm interested as hell....the only thing that stopped that up trend was that so-so quarter...the minute this shows L2i results. IT'S GONE IMO. I'd just rather play it out of the bottom of the hole, so far I'm ahead on interest income and reduced price. But now that I've gone this far..unless something earth shattering develops I want to sit past Y2k, that's my plan.