SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zsteve who wrote (70418)11/12/1999 8:55:00 AM
From: Earlie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Hi Steve:

Loved the article. It provides a bit of vindication at this end. We have been saying that DDR is a much better technical bet than Rambus for many months now.

Add in the fact that the DDR chips work with both high AND low performance micros, then factor in the fact that they can be produced for much lower manufacturing costs and one has to come to the same conclusion about RMBS as was our conclusion about Iridium,.....it is a dead duck and a superb short target.

Of course, even in the face of this evidence, certain analysts will still "reiterate" that "Rambus will take fifty percent market share in 2000". (g)

Questions re Intel:
- This is the company that many analysts think has a "powerhouse research foundation" (a view not shared at this end). Intel provided cheques worth hundreds of millions of dollars to try to encourage a less-than-enthusiastic memory manufacturing group to get involved with Rambus. Most manufacturers told Intel bluntly that it didn't make sense.

Intel was smart enough to acquire stock in most of these companies when they wrote the cheques and no doubt the company may well have profited by selling that stock to an unsuspecting public (Intel has made inordinate profit in the last few quarters through the sale of previously acquired stock, especially in internet companies). Has Intel maintained its public positive attitudes towards Rambus in order that it could at least recoup some of its costs through stock sales?


Best, Earlie



To: zsteve who wrote (70418)11/12/1999 11:20:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
zs, As Rambus enthusiasts know, the performance may be worse, but it has the huge advantage of costing a lot more DDR. <G>