Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Cohen who wrote (16010)	11/12/1999 10:09:00 AM
From: J. M. Burr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

I think I've seen it all. 10:00AM, bid 6 1/8(12), ask 6 1/8 (50) at 49,600 shares. The ask is inexhaustable and immovable for the time being. Could be possible by day's end to buy in the 5's.

To: Robert Cohen who wrote (16010)	11/12/1999 10:23:00 AM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Robert: LOL! Yah, Wexler is yet another of any number of examples of cyberspace's self-style 7-11 clerk pundits who "hang a shingle" out in the form of a thread ostensibly designed to promulgate their opinion. Who really knows these peoples backgrounds, eh? Tantamount to practicing medicine without a license(imho). ;-) Fortunately, I'm sure most folks understand them for what they are, shrug it off and move on. Particularly when those same pundits continually refuse to provide hard data to back their position. So it goes..... Meanwhile, VLNC's trading pretty much as I expect. It'll probably be stalled, and "managed" for some time to come until end game is complete. Remember, despite our attention to it, it really is an unknown, thinly held stock. It's going to take time for it to build a presence, and truly turn around its history. The turn has been made, now for sales and operations to continue to do their job. In the meantime...I've got other speculative equities to watch as they got me just'a giggling BIG time. Hee heeeee! John~

To: Robert Cohen who wrote (16010)	11/12/1999 2:35:00 PM
From: mooter775	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Robert, Thank you very much for your posting of the Dog Pound's reaction to the recent contract announcement - ie, that is was insignificant, and clearly an insider deal. It indicates more than most words their true ignorance about the company. I truly hope they took the opportunity to increase their sales and short sales yesterday and today. And equally important, it indicates the degree of abject ignorance of at least one segment of the 'short community'. Valence's contract was not with an internal party. The OEM is worldwide and extremely successful. And I expect more contracts with this OEM to follow. Please, Mr. Bill, respond and reaffirm your "knowledge" about Valence's poor prospects....