SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Captain Jack who wrote (71712)11/12/1999 10:24:00 AM
From: Elwood P. Dowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
This is a response I rec'd on the CNBC thread after I thanked Kernan for his efforts this morning in interviewing Kumar. El To: Elwood P. Dowd (3988 )
From: Gary M. Reed
Friday, Nov 12 1999 9:35AM ET
Reply # of 3989

CNBC Shill-o-meter is going off the scale.

Hypothetical situation..."XYZ," trading at 60x earnings, pre-announces a month ago. Now
the stock trades where it was *before* the preannouncement. Earnings come in...they don't
even beat the new (lowered) estimate...simply meet them...and 2 cents under the so-called
"whisper" number.

Given the above-mentioned scenario, you know the Squawk crew would be having a field
day "piling on" and spreading the doom-and-gloom. BUT, when the stock is DELL, a
CNBC-Lite viewer fave, heaven forbid anything bad gets said...cripes, by listening to Kernan,
Haines and Faber this morning, you'd think DELL exceeded estimates by a long shot.
Exhibit One of how CNBC producers are loathe to negatively spin any news regarding the
me-too, CNBC-Lite viewer fave stocks. I betcha they get a ton of hate e-mail anytime they
even hint at speaking poorly of the CNBC-Lite viewer fave stocks (AOL, DELL, CSCO, etc.).

When a company trades at 60x earnings and simply "meets" estimates that have already
been pared due to a pre-announcement, that is not good...regardless of how you spin it.
Shame on CNBC-Lite for caving in to appease viewers.

And, in fairness to CNBC, CNNfn was spreading the same hype this a.m. Still doesn't make
it right, though. I will laugh the next time Kernan slams a stock for simply meeting
downward-revised estimates.






To: Captain Jack who wrote (71712)11/12/1999 10:34:00 AM
From: Elwood P. Dowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
ML downgrades INTC. El