Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Earlie who wrote (70433)	11/12/1999 10:52:00 AM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Burke's claims that AMAT is going out of business is the only foolish thing here, beside the person himself. Let's not forget his claim WHICH WAS NEVER SUBSTANTIATED that AMAT owns a majority portion of a foundry. MB spreads lies and incorrect claims. BK

To: Earlie who wrote (70433)	11/12/1999 11:23:00 AM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

Earlie from Earlie RMBS taking it in the neck this A.M. It's been a long wait, but when reality finally surfaces, it can be painful for those who chose to exclusively follow the charts. At this end, there is a tiny grin. In spite of the unfolding significant reduction in RMBS' market cap, this is only the first step in the fall down the cellar stairs. The dip will no doubt be bought, but to what end? What is also satisfying is the fact that many of the now obvious technical problems have been well aired on this thread. Later today, I'll try to post a curious but fascinating "aside" with respect to Intel/RMBS dealings. Best, Earlie