Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : A CENTURY OF LIONS/THE 20TH CENTURY TOP 100 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jbe who wrote (1536)	11/12/1999 4:02:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3246

I have considered them. I disagree with the Amazon blurb, but I never finished the Principia Mathematica,so perhaps I am naive. As far as I can tell, though, mathematical logic has been pretty sterile except for its influence on Games Theory, which is important....Pierce and James are essentially 19th century figures, and I have earlier spoken of my objections to Dewey....The Vienna Circle may have some claim, but I think they were pretty much wrong in dismissing traditional questions....Wittgenstein and "ordinary language theory" have some cache, by I always thought it sterile....Now, the Neo- Thomists (Maritain, Gilson, even Mortimer Adler) may have a claim....LOL!