Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : INVT - Investamerica, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (61)	11/14/1999 3:53:00 AM
From: DizzyG	Respond to of 214

Ahhh, Francois... So much emotion and indignation from a tout, I'm honored. Alas, your response is typical and predictable: as you and your SSB's friends are clearly on a CONSPIRATORIAL SHORTING BINGE... Whenever questions arise about the integrity of information for these OTCBB P&D plays, promoters like you always fall back to your Hymnal of Hype for an inane reply. Tsk,tsk... Although, I must admit that I did like this: you're on IGNORE from now on, which suits well an IGNORAMUS such as yourself... I love it how cheerleaders like you always use the ignore feature. Again, a typical and predictable response. Don't worry though, I will continue to comment on your hype. If you choose to ignore my comments, so be it. Have a nice day... Diz-

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (61)	11/14/1999 3:56:00 AM
From: DizzyG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 214

Oh, I almost forgot, Francois... Speaking of trash on RB, I thought this was an interesting post. Apparently Brian Kitts has a rather colorful past, eh? Background Check Info: The Background Check scans the U.S. public records and obtains the name of the company or individual you're searching. Not all states are included to run the background check. Disclaimer: This information is provided on an as-is basis and will need to verified by the appropriate databases. To verify the accuracy and dates of this data please do it with the appropriate local, state, or federal database. Search Criteria-Brian Kitts-All States-Database Items searched are: 1) Bankruptcy Records 2) UCC Records 3) Liens 4) Judgments Detail Record No. 1 Information Current: 01-05-1992 through 11-13-1999 BANKRUPTCY Filed: DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case Number: 9727111 Chapter: CHAPTER 7 DISCHARGE Filing Date: 11-17-1997 Status: OPEN Schedule 341 Date: 12-22-1997 Release Date: 03-04-1998 Attorney: ROBERT I COHEN Law firm: ROBERT I COHEN PC Filing Location: DISTRICT OF COLORADO/DENVER 721 19TH ST. DENVER, CO 80202 State: COLORADO Court: U. S. BANKRUPTCY COURT Debtor (s): KITTS BRIAN Additional Info: BANKRUPTCY: 1. KITTS BRIAN filed a bankruptcy on 11-17-1997 in STATE DISTRICT, CO. UCC RECORDS 1. KITTS, BRIAN appears as a debtor in a UCC filed on 12-18-1995 in GA. 2. KITTS, BRIAN appears as a debtor in a UCC filed on 05-08-1996 in GA. LIENS 1. KITTS BRIAN appears as a debtor in a lien filed on 08-06-1993 in DENVER county, CO. 2. KITTS BRIAN appears as a debtor in a lien filed on 04-19-1993 in DENVER county, CO. 3. KITTS BRIAN appears as a debtor in a lien filed on 04-19-1993 in DENVER county, CO. 4. KITTS BRIAN appears as a debtor in a lien filed on 08-06-1993 in DENVER county, CO. 5. KITTS BRIAN appears as a debtor in a lien filed on 04-19-1993 in DENVER county, CO. The following states were not covered: NJ, PR, VI. US Liens Source and Effective Date Information. JUDGEMENTS 1. KITTS BRIAN is a debtor in a judgment filed in DENVER County, CO. 2. KITTS BRIAN is a debtor in a judgment filed in DENVER County, CO. 3. KITTS BRIAN is a debtor in a judgment filed in DENVER County, CO. 4. KITTS BRIAN is a debtor in a judgment filed in HAMILTON County, OH. 5. KITTS BRIAN is a debtor in a judgment filed in DENVER County, CO. The following states were not covered: NJ, NC, PR, VI, VT. US Judgments Source and Effective Date Information 1. KITTS BRIAN appears as a debtor in a FEDERAL TAX LIEN lien filed on 08-06-1993 in DENVER county, CO. First lien holder is IRS. 2. KITTS BRIAN appears as a debtor in a FEDERAL TAX LIEN lien filed on 04-19-1993 in DENVER county, CO. First lien holder is IRS. 3. KITTS BRIAN appears as a debtor in a FEDERAL TAX LIEN RELEASE lien filed on 04-19-1993 in DENVER county, CO. First lien holder is IRS. 4. KITTS BRIAN appears as a debtor in a FEDERAL TAX LIEN RELEASE lien filed on 08-06-1993 in DENVER county, CO. First lien holder is IRS. 5. KITTS BRIAN appears as a debtor in a FEDERAL TAX LIEN lien filed on 04-19-1993 in DENVER county, CO. First lien holder is IRS. 6. KITTS BRIAN is a debtor in a CIVIL JUDGMENT filed in DENVER County, CO on 04-09-1992. First creditor is COMBINED COMMUNICATIONS. 7. KITTS BRIAN is a debtor in a CIVIL JUDGMENT filed in DENVER County, CO on 12-21-1992. First creditor is DENVER PUBLISHING CO. 8. KITTS BRIAN is a debtor in a CIVIL JUDGMENT filed in DENVER County, CO on 11-01-1993. First creditor is NATIONAL BUSINESS FINANCE. 9. KITTS BRIAN is a debtor in a CIVIL JUDGMENT filed in HAMILTON County, OH on 07-13-1995. First creditor is JOHN GOURLEY. 10. KITTS BRIAN is a debtor in a CIVIL JUDGMENT RELEASE filed in DENVER County, CO on 04-25-1994. First creditor is METRO COLLECTION SVC. ragingbull.com Diz-

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (61)	11/14/1999 4:03:00 AM
From: DizzyG	Respond to of 214

One last thing, Francois... I did find it odd that you called the information I published on RB: Shorters Trash. In an effort to be fair, I thought I would publish my alleged "Shorters Trash" here as well. Enjoy... Pump and Dump. This technique is employed by those promoters and brokers who want to inflate the value of a stock, stimulate investor interest, and bail out of their own holdings. The former shell company, with its "exciting" new business, is an ideal candidate. In order to "pump" the value of the stock the company and its promoters will generate a series of positive press releases highlighting the merger and new developments and plans. Analysts may be paid to recommend the stock and brokers may tout the company?s future prospects, often in overinflated terms. If a brokerage firm has been instrumental in the merger (which is frequently the case) its brokers and cold callers will begin to solicit new investors by recommending the stock. As stock prices move upward based upon these "news items" inside stockholders dump their shares on an unsuspecting public. And who are these insiders? They can include the major inside stockholders and promoters who put the deal together, the analysts who recommend the stock, consultants who generate public interest and the former owners of the private company. Recent efforts by the SEC have been directed at thwarting the "pump and dump." In particular, the SEC recently amended the rules governing the use of Form S-8 to register securities. Form S-8 is a short form of registration that contains little disclosure about the company. It was designed for use by companies in connection with the issuance of stock and options to employees. Over the years the definition of "employees" expanded to include consultants and outside contractors (like attorneys) who performed services for the company. In its recent amendments the SEC expressed concern that companies had used Form S-8 to register stock issued on a reverse-merger to "consultants," including promoters, finders, and their friends who are involved in conditioning the market for the company?s securities by promoting the stock. Those individuals sometimes make the registered shares available to brokers who are part of a "pump and dump" scheme. Under the amended rules, Form S-8 may not be used to register shares given to consultants for their work in connection with a capital raising transaction or their efforts, either directly or indirectly, to promote or maintain a market for the company?s securities. While this change may force the pump and dumpsters to be more creative, rest assured, such schemes will persist. Companies will continue to issue shares to consultants for services that remain permissible under S-8. Shell insiders may register shares before a reverse-merger to assure a ready supply. They will also take advantage of Rule 144 which permits certain sales of unregistered stock after a one-year holding period. If all else fails you can expect that serious scamsters will simply ignore the S-8 amendments, register the shares issued to "consultants" and disappear from the scene leaving the company and its new management to face the regulatory music. stockpatrol.com Note to thread: does any of this sound familiar? Diz-