To: Edwarda who wrote (1610 ) 11/14/1999 11:31:00 AM From: jbe Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3246
To be frank, Edwarda, that passage is a little too arch for me. And too overstuffed: too many adjectives, too many "thats" (..." And where the drama came in was that it was patent that his attention had not yet been drawn to the fact that he was being chivvied..."). But maybe it's just my own perverse sense of humor. Here's the type of thing that cracks me up(from a long monologue in Beckett's Watt ): ....Haw! Hell! Haw! So. My laugh, Mr.---? I beg your pardon? Haw. My laugh, Mr. Watt. Christian name forgotten. Yes. Of all the laughs that strictly speaking are not laughs, but modes of ululation, only three I think need detain us. I mean the bitter, the hollow and the mirthless. They correspond to successive..how shall I say...successive excoriations of the understanding, and the passage from the one to the other is the passage from the lesser to the greater, from the lower to the higher, from the outer to the inner, from the gross to the fine, from the matter to the form. The laugh that now is mirthless once was hollow, the laugh that once was hollow once was bitter. And the laugh that once was bitter? Eyewater, Mr. Watt, eyewater. But do not let us waste our time with that, do not let us waste any more time with that, Mr. Watt. No. Where were we. The bitter, the hollow, and -- Haw! Haw! -- the mirthless. The bitter laugh laughs at that which is not good, it is the ethical laugh. The hollow laugh laughs at that which is not true, it is the intellectual laugh. Not good! Not true! Well, well. But the mirthless laugh is the dianoetic laugh, down the snout -- Haw! -- so. It is the laugh of laughs, the risus purus , the laugh laughing at the laugh, the beholding, the saluting of the highest joke, in a word the laugh that laughs -- silence please -- at that which is unhappy. Personally of course I regret all. All, all, all...