SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bux who wrote (49873)11/14/1999 3:39:00 PM
From: Sawtooth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Have to agree with you on this one, Bux. While nobody is likely to argue that taxes should be the only sell consideration, I'll say it would line up pretty close to 50/50 in a taxes matter/taxes don't matter poll of the general investing pop.

<< The lowest risk/highest reward path to fantastic wealth is letting your gains in excellent companies compound year after year. >>

And might I modify that slightly to add: ...letting your gains in excellent companies compound year after year and deferring the payment of taxes on gains as long as possible.

A very profitable combo.

......VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV



To: Bux who wrote (49873)11/14/1999 3:55:00 PM
From: Jimmyjohn  Respond to of 152472
 
Excellent post Bux. I couldn't agree with you more. Tried trading short term a few years ago and is not worth it in a taxable account. Now when I trade it is only in my IRA. All my Q holdings are in the taxable account and I have held on for a long long time. Facing the payment of taxes on profits has encouraged me to avoid trading the Q shares, so indirectly the tax man has helped me hold the course.



To: Bux who wrote (49873)11/14/1999 4:05:00 PM
From: Greg Jung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Sounds good, Bux. Now just point me to the stock that
will appreciate 50% per year for 5 or 10 years. -g-
In fact those that do so "on average" have 50% fluctuations during a year and can go months at level or down, followed by a 100% increment in a week, etc. Try investing in SGI by your "tax efficient" method and you have diddlysquat.

Greg



To: Bux who wrote (49873)11/15/1999 2:42:00 AM
From: PAL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Of course there are special cases that might come into play like if the difference is just oine day to make it short or long term gain, and the outlook is just the same for those two days. Nevertheless, in general taxes should never override good decision in investing.



To: Bux who wrote (49873)11/15/1999 10:18:00 AM
From: GO*QCOM  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
I agree with your illustrated post.One question though.If you sell and buy back the same stock in a short period of time would that not be considered a "wash" and not trigger a taxable event.