SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : A CENTURY OF LIONS/THE 20TH CENTURY TOP 100 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (1639)11/14/1999 11:40:00 PM
From: jbe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3246
 
That's probably a different kind of psychohistory than the one Edwarda is talking about, Charley. <g> The academic psychohistorians (and it is not a separate discipline) pepper their subjects with Freud before serving them up. (Or with Ericson, whose "Young Man Luther" is a classic of the genre, or with who have you.) Anyway, I have the feeling that psychohistory is petering out, now that traditional psychoanalysis has gone out of style.

Couldn't resist taking a cyberpeek at the titles in the latest issue of The Journal of Psychohistory, and two of them, it seemed to me, have promise. <g>

The Gulf War as a Mental Disorder
Clinton's America: The Phallic Presidency

Anyway, you probably know this all already, and are just pulling legs again. So -- what did Hari Seldon have in mind by psychohistory?

Joan



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (1639)11/15/1999 12:11:00 AM
From: jbe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3246
 
Here we go: The Gulf War as a Mental Disorder, or: Bush & the Evil Castrating Mommy (or was it Daddy?).

psychohistory.com

I just could not resist that title. I always thought there was something really weird about the Gulf War (almost as weird as the Panama operation), but I could not quite put my finger on it.

The above article is also weird, and in spots unintentionally funny. And I object to the use of the word "we", as in "We were depressed." Speak for yourself, sonny! Nevertheless, some interesting insights here. (And I had forgotten all about the cartoons of Bush in a dress and with a pocketbook!)

Perhaps those who want to see Bush in the Top 100 might want to take a look at this little chef d'oeuvre of psychohistory...<g>

Next up: Clinton & the Phallic Presidency, if I can find it on the web. Or maybe not: nobody has proposed Clinton for the Top 100.



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (1639)11/15/1999 8:03:00 AM
From: Edwarda  Respond to of 3246
 
I had in mind works such as Erikson's, as Joan observed. The early stuff got very heavyhanded, but the more subtle influence remains.