Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (92431)	11/14/1999 9:29:00 PM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

stephen Re <<if Intel wanted they could undercut AMD at all levels of microprocessors and in fact put them out of business.>> For crying out load, stop posting this none sense. Intel is trying to compete with AMD the best they can and every one in their right mind would expect them to. Now you say, they intentionally are trying to let AMD survive so they will not be hit with a lawsuit? This is clear indication, for your lack of understanding of this whole monopoly subject, and the battle between INTC and AMD. What makes a monopoly illegal? Do you know? Mani

To: puborectalis who wrote (92431)	11/14/1999 9:59:00 PM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Stephen, Re:"You obviously lack a corpus callosum.....if Intel wanted they could undercut AMD at all levels of microprocessors and in fact put them out of business.....I guess you've never heard of a "lost leader " Intel tried this trick with the Celerons. They sure put rise, cyrix, winchip out of business. Unfortunately AMD designed a better faster processor - the ATHLON. And now Intel is fumbling and bumbling with its screwed up Coppermine intoduction. Introducing speed grades they cannot ship, with a motherboard that doesn't work and a new memory no-one can afford. And your brilliant analysis is that Intel is screwing up left and right just to keep AMD alive. SIMPLY BRILLIANT ANALYSIS. Keep up the great work. Kash