Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d:oug who wrote (12297)	11/14/1999 10:59:00 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

A short addition to my last post of a "what if" my speculation is true. Continuing along the same path of thoughts... What I spoke of was a lawsuit against Jensen & Twiford, not the path of a shareholders meeting, but a direct "STOP THE MUSIC" type action. First fact to obtain is that Jensen only allowed a Twiford solution. Second, after how many years of a Twiford failure would a new path for a solution be executed FOR the shareholders. Third, for an example assume 5 years. So the lawsuit would be initiated for those gpgi shareholders that purchased gpgi shares 5 years ago, AND during the 5 year period ALWAYS held gpgi shares, as it would reflect a continuous period of shareholder investment involvement. As for me, and after the 5 years prior, I would not be represented, and if Jensen's shares were obtained, I would not obtain any since it would represent a compensation of sort. just thinking more doug