Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mani1 who wrote (92445)	11/14/1999 11:21:00 PM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Your naivete is understandable considering your only 26 years old.Geez,you've never even experienced a bear market.

To: Mani1 who wrote (92445)	11/15/1999 8:39:00 AM
From: f.simons	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

>>Sure stephen, sure! Show me a proof that "well known fund manager often commentating on CNBC" says that INTC wants to keep AMD in business!<< Mani- How would AMD's survival be affected if Intel lowered its selling price on its fastest CPU to $50? Sure, Intel would lose money at that point, but this discussion is about AMD's survival being in Intel's hands. Intel would survive the scenario, AMD wouldn't. The Feds would be on Intel in a flash, however. If AMD flounders on its own, Intel would be in the unenviable position of looking a lot like Microsoft to those same Feds. Ergo, it is in Intel's interest to see that AMD survives. That is Steve's point, and he is correct. Frank