Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (16096)	11/15/1999 12:04:00 AM
From: golden_tee	Respond to of 27311

Larry, You seem to be into truth in posting lately. I think that it is time that you admit to posting under the alias Nowaynohow on Yahoo. Well, what about it? We all know you two are one and the same, why are you afraid to admit it? Are you trying to deceive lurkers? Do you think the rest of us are stupid? Please, if you are ever to gain credibility on SI, you have to take responsibility for your BS over on Yahoo. Be a man, quit hiding.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (16096)	11/15/1999 12:10:00 AM
From: Pallisard	Respond to of 27311

Larry, 5 out of the last 8 posts were yours. Is this your small contribution to the short coalition to control the price tomorrow?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (16096)	11/15/1999 8:42:00 AM
From: eli74	Respond to of 27311

Thanks for your answer Larry. I think the important thing to keep in mind is that things have unfolded as the bulls had said they would. (Not necessarily when, granted). The attraction to Valence is its potential future. The bulls have said that the company has had a technological lead, and offers a product that is superior to anything else in the marketplace. The purchase order announced last week would certainly seem to corraborate that. The company also seems to have sources of financing in place, or at least enough financing to avoid the possibility of financial collapse. It may be expensive financing, and perhaps Lev et al were fools to let themselves be hoodwinked by Castle Creek, but they do have the necessary financing. And if the company is as successful as it appears they will be, then the dilution involved won't make a damn bit of difference in the long term. And finally, in terms of the bulls, i.e., Mooter, Klemancic etc., they have been guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of being too optomisitic too soon. But they have also been willing to put their money where their mouths are in terms of building long positions. I wonder if the bears on this thread have been willing to do the same. Warren Buffet has been quoted as saying that in terms of investment analysis, "It is better to be approximately right than precisely wrong." Its good to remember that when discussing things like who said what when, and if something predicted didn't occur by a certain time frame, then the person making that predicition was a liar and a fool. The game in this stock is only in the very early innings. So relax and let it unfold.