Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Walliker who wrote (34600)	11/15/1999 11:26:00 AM
From: Don Green	Respond to of 93625

O.T. Anyone want to see some real stock movement keep an eye on Askj It seems that day traders keep trying to short the stop only to get their heads handed to them. The real danger is the extremely light volume in this stock. Take a look at it's 1 month chart. Amazing Don

To: John Walliker who wrote (34600)	11/15/1999 11:43:00 AM
From: Glenn Norman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Yo_John Walliker................Excellent reply to Ali Chin. You are very clear and accurate in your responses, you leave no doubt about your findings and the correctness of your work! Thanks and keep up the good work. Salude to you John - Norman L R for a V L T!

To: John Walliker who wrote (34600)	11/15/1999 1:44:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

John, <24. MINIMUM RISE OR FALL TIME = 1.000 ns> Who cares what kind of bogus numbers are used in your perfect simulations. Stop fudging your numbers please. The RAMBUS spec, rdram_128d_0059_10.pdf, says on p 44: CTM and CFM fall and rise times min=0.2ns, max=0.5ns; Data fall and rise times: min=0.2ns, max=0.65ns. So I guess you are some 100% off, and your simulated numbers with fudged down simulated parameters are not very convincing. <Now you suggest that theory is all very well but the results will be totally different in practice. OK then. Go ahead and do some Monte Carlo simulations of a Rambus...> Simulations again? How do you expect a system to run on simulations alone? Not a Monte-Carlo, but "Real-Field" exercises have shown that there are problems in mass manufacturability of RAMBUS - two delays since March do say something. Or these were the "simulated launches" only? <Then let us all know what the safety margin is at the device inputs. I will be very interested to see your results. I don't see why I should do all the work myself.> Certainly you should not. OEM did this work for you, two times already, with two different set of parameters. You know the result about margins - there appears to be none :)