SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wm sharp who wrote (16161)11/15/1999 5:12:00 PM
From: John Curtis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
Wm: About that article. What, you don't believe in coincidences?!!? ;-) Ohhh, yah, the timing is VERY interesting. Like I said earlier today, I've been amazed at the depth of collusion within the short tactician ranks. I gotta think this article is their last gasp, pull out all the hammers attempt to stall this equity. If so, today's ending certainly seems to say it didn't work...

So maybe VLNC is FINALLY on it's way, with more P.O.'s to follow?? And with the talking heads on CNBC stating that there appears to be market rotation into small cap's going on.....well....this p.o. announcement couldn't come at a better time to entice some of that inflow. Bottom line? We now have the pleasure of sitting back and trying to guess where this equities gonna go...and for the first time in a while, the guessing can be limited to the upwards direction.

Regards!

John~



To: wm sharp who wrote (16161)11/15/1999 5:16:00 PM
From: MGV  Respond to of 27311
 
A thousand red flags just went up.

sfgate.com

How many warning signs do you all really require?

Greater than 5 PSR? After, the space ship trailing the comet lands.



To: wm sharp who wrote (16161)11/15/1999 5:20:00 PM
From: Dennis V.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
SF Chronicle; Isn't this the same outlet that stumbled when attempting to give favorable publicity to ULBI? They published a statement from an interview with one of the co's mid level execs who had recently given different and conflicting information to some investors. The guy left the co. The cheerleader on the ULBI thread said it was a misunderstanding.