Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (1027)	11/16/1999 5:16:00 AM
From: Bux	Respond to of 12235

Then it is made into aircraft, some of which seem to crash in the ocean to the NE of New York. How come? They don't do that when they take off from Heathrow. Even more perplexing is the U.S. fixation on who will be in charge of the crash investigation. Let's see, should it be the NTSB, the CIA or the FBI? I know, let's let them all work on it. The more the merrier! Then we'll argue over who said what, who's in charge and why the damn plane fell from the sky, whether it went up or down, whether people saw a missile going up or a decapitated 747 emulating a rocket. We'll deny any ships were in the area, bury the radar data and fix the black box. Then we'll ridicule the most rational explanations and anyone who dares to make any sense and propose that low voltage wires ignited a fuel mixture about as explosive as an oil lamp even though we have no evidence this happened. Then we'll arrest people with evidence to the contrary, clear the merger of the only U.S. air manufacturers of anti-trust concerns, and act like nothing unusual happened. Bux