Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boplicity who wrote (50226)	11/15/1999 10:42:00 PM
From: Neal davidson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Will your timing prognostications be better with QCOM than with CNXT?? Message 11903084

To: Boplicity who wrote (50226)	11/15/1999 10:47:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

You and Voltaire are two of the most respected short term forecasters on the thread, Greg, but you seem to be having different visions. Ordinarily I wouldn't care, since I have my own vision for the longer term, and think I see Q at >1000 by this time next year. But due to greed, I have acquired a significant position January calls, so the run up to the split is of great interest. I'm sure many other normally LT investors are in the same position. It would be very useful if you could expand on your prediction of a downtrend for Q. Do you see this as a lengthy process, as occurred in September, or a series of interday dips? And what is your estimate for Q's price at the end of this month, and at the end of the year? tia, uf

To: Boplicity who wrote (50226)	11/15/1999 10:48:00 PM
From: Hobie1Kenobe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Greg, What a gift that would be for those who got off the train too soon. Gotta think the options MM's need to take this down a bit -- they may have sold too many unhedged calls over the past 2 weeks. JMHO. JF3

To: Boplicity who wrote (50226)	11/15/1999 11:02:00 PM
From: Voltaire	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

Gregg, I love you but I am absolutely stunned by your post and I am concerned about all those who have P.M. me tonight and I answered. I will bet you $1,000 in the face of this thread that this stock will hit $400 in the next ten days. Uncle frank can hold the money, this is not a joke, that is how much I believe it. You will not have to pay anything, I am making the bet against my prediction. I would dearly love to see this stock go down to where you talk about but it AIN'T. I cannot believe people have lost sight of what this 4 to 1 split means. People are treating this stock as if it is that damn AMZN for Christ sakes. Anyway, I HAVE A BET WITH MYSELF. $1,000. Mark it down folks. Now everybody go to bed and realize what happened today. Now go to bed and we will talk more about this in the morning. Voltaire

To: Boplicity who wrote (50226)	11/15/1999 11:39:00 PM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Gregg, what Carlton Clutts School of Charting are you using? /jw

To: Boplicity who wrote (50226)	11/15/1999 11:40:00 PM
From: Brian Malloy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

FWIW, As I read the chart, QCOM would actually have to go under $218 to break support. This has been a parabolic rise with many gaps along the way. We have not stayed anywhere long enough to call it a support level. What I think we are really seeing is a pull back to the 5-10 DMA where QCOM normally trades. We were way up and out of the channel. IMHO

To: Boplicity who wrote (50226)	11/15/1999 11:51:00 PM
From: r.edwards	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

I think the handset sale news and wireless HDR internet news and the 4/1 split will propel it past 150$ per share on a post split basis. imho