SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Millstream Mines (MLSM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just G who wrote (488)11/16/1999 3:00:00 PM
From: Brumell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 664
 
Thanks Just G. That's about what I'd guessed. Move the drill about 75 meters east and back to intersect deeper.

Did he have any comment about what could be known if a downhole test was done. We don't know this was done but it's logical to assume with all the work Quantec did. We also didn't know there was a prior hole to use or that it was deepened "recently" but that's another story.

Things could be far better than previously indicated... and someone got a lot of very cheap stock recently.

Regards,
Bob



To: Just G who wrote (488)11/17/1999 8:39:00 PM
From: matt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 664
 
just G
I always believed that massive sulphides
were charg high res low ?was that a typo.
Or is it possible ip picked up res high
(felsic) horizon with diss sulphides?
Of course this high tech IP technique
could be different than old IP Interp.
I do know that texas gulf ip on 143 MT
deposit was charg high res low and to this
day has the highest ever recorded metal
factor according to geophysical textbooks
1993 edition.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News