Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jakers12 who wrote (50465)	11/16/1999 7:33:00 PM
From: Voltaire	Respond to of 152472

let everyone laugh, it's OK. V

To: jakers12 who wrote (50465)	11/16/1999 7:54:00 PM
From: Voltaire	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 152472

It is amazing that you get about the same thing I did and I had no idea what you have used. I just did mine with my own technique - if it happens it happens if it does not then so be it but mine is as follows. If people went back to my original formula and then added 1.5 for Scarcity - 163 X 5 + 4 divided 3 X 1.5 = or 163 X 9 = 1467 divided by 3 = 489 X 1.5 = 733 before split after split assuming no more splits - 489 hard factor X 1.5 = 733 again at end of 2000 - you say 2003, 2800 will certainly come before then. oh well, V