SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert G. Ruth who wrote (20566)11/16/1999 11:17:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 25548
 
FWIW from RB

By: Crafty1
Reply To: 2998 by Handshake
Tuesday, 16 Nov 1999 at 6:30 PM EST
Post # of 3004

It seemed to me, that this being a material statement of fact there would be some reciprocal announcement on the Nasdaq
"company" side.
Being unable to find such an animal - I called Russell Godwin to inquire if I was going to be able to find one.
He suggested it was only a material statement " in MDHM's" case. 3 or 4 major shareholders of the other company have
agreed to go forward and it is being taken to a special meeting of shareholders for a vote close to the end of the month.
This other company as an example would have an asset... they would sell that asset and dividend the proceeds to it's
shareholders - thus leaving a shell company. That shell would then be the basis for the combined/merged new company. In my
opinion what would go into that is the two properties from MDHM's side and financing of drilling from the other side.
What the ratio's are going to be (as to who puts in what) ... is probably what is giving the us 200 day window in that it's
probably based on the next round of drilling results.
The vote on the other side will probably give management the latitude to work within certain parameters to get the deal
done.... based on results I assume.
Any comments??
If they trade at $5... and put up 3 mill to drill .. we put up the properties .... 20 mill in market cap(approx) that works out to
between 6 and 7-1, give us some latitude for the possibility of a great property. maybe it becomes 4 or 5 -1.

who knows this may not be all bad.
Crafty1