SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CDDD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: WTMHouston who wrote (237)11/17/1999 2:23:00 AM
From: Doug Axford  Respond to of 924
 
I rarely post and don't own stock in CDDD. I spent many hours researching this over the past 2 days, because if it is real, the stock would bankroll my retirement. After all the research - the only thing that comes to my mind is one simple word "BRE-X". Need I say more? I think we are either witnessing one of the two biggest scams this century (the other being BRE-X) or the first product of reverse alien technology. Where is Fox Mulder when you need him? This beats the soaps by a long shot.
Spoke to a broker who specializes in VSE and he said "Spend your money in Vegas - the odds are better"
Doug



To: WTMHouston who wrote (237)11/17/1999 8:22:00 PM
From: Q.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 924
 
the co. has not one, but several people in north america, according to the filing.

One might assume that at least one of them is in Canada, and maybe Vancouver in particular, or they would have simply said 'United States', rather than 'North America.'

re. the 'silicon valley office', the filing does say that they have one officer who 'resides' in in silicon valley.

It goes on to discuss how the silicon valley location 'would be' ideal for the company. That seems to suggest that maybe the company would relocate there in the future.

What it doesn't say is where the company is, right now. Which is just one of the reasons why the filing feels strange, when I read it.