Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (92645)	11/17/1999 12:55:00 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Well, "Howdy" stranger.

To: Scumbria who wrote (92645)	11/17/1999 1:22:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Scumbria - <"We need more maturity with the [0.18-micron] process," he admitted. > I would be curious as to the context of this statement relative to the question. He also said referring to this particular ramp that the situation was not atypical. To meet an upside demand condition, maybe a more mature .18 process would be needed. Yes indeed, a perfect world where inventory vs. orders is always net sum zero would indeed be very cool. BTW, Alfs (Intel spokesperson) yesterday said that production schedules are being met. Did Gelsinger say today that they were not? I didn't get that. We could go on and on arguing about how the .18 ramp is going. It's sort of pointless, because my hands are tied w.r.t. specifics. You all will just have to hash it out until it becomes apparent at the Q1 CC. PB