SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : A CENTURY OF LIONS/THE 20TH CENTURY TOP 100 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jbe who wrote (1789)11/17/1999 3:42:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3246
 
Oops, another honest lib:

In those days, Republicans could depend on Democrats. When Ronald Reagan moved to destroy the evil empire of the Soviets, congressional Democrats and liberals in general derided and denounced him. The Democrats backed a nuclear freeze, opposed efforts to support those fighting communists in El Salvador and Nicaragua, and railed against Reagan's ultimately successful attempts to weaken the Soviet state by escalating the costs of the arms race. When Reagan spoke for the working classes and against disastrous and elitist policies in welfare, crime and education, he could count on liberals to scorn him most terribly. And so continued the steady gains for conservatism and the steady march of the Republican Party toward majority status.

washingtonpost.com
- from thinking liberal Michael Kelly, in today's Washington Post. Kelly is the editor in chief of National Journal.



To: jbe who wrote (1789)11/17/1999 9:40:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3246
 
Markets are not always fair, it is true, and sometimes the unfairness needs to be rectified. However, coercion should not be used merely to achieve the results we should prefer, or freedom has no meaning. The manipulation of culture by politicians is always something we should view with skepticism.....