SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (63351)11/17/1999 6:06:00 PM
From: Null Dog Ago  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Interesting facts about "Jane Roe":
1)Went out drinking irresponsibly and wound up in bed with a lot of men, thus resulting in unwanted pregnancies.
2)Had change of heart and is now pro-life.



To: Ilaine who wrote (63351)11/17/1999 7:54:00 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108807
 
No, I haven't read the law. I gathered my opinion from discussions with my cousin who was (he is deceased, unfortunately) a State's Attorney and had a private practice for awhile. He was active in Democratic Party politics and was pro-choice. He and his friends, most of whom were lawyers, agreed that Roe was badly written.

My understanding is the decision flowed from a line of cases following the Griswold decision, where the court implied a right of privacy from "penumbras" it created out of whole cloth. The Supremes implied the right from other rights found in the Constitution. Until Roe abortion was regulated by the states and should have been left that way.

Didn't a plaintiff in Roe come forward and admit the facts as set forth in the case were fraudulent? The whole thing was cooked up by the abortion lobby.

Anyway, I didn't intend to rehash the abortion argument. No minds are going to be changed around here, I know that. I thought the picture was touching and thought provoking.



To: Ilaine who wrote (63351)11/17/1999 9:22:00 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
<<I believe that Roe v. Wade was EXCELLENTLY written>>

Check it out:

cnn.com



To: Ilaine who wrote (63351)11/18/1999 12:47:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
>>I believe that Roe v. Wade was EXCELLENTLY written

Forget about it, even Libs don't believe that. It was pure sophistry, based on a lie (you do know the facts).