Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (33608)	11/17/1999 11:07:00 PM
From: Lee Lichterman III	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99985

Heinz, I have talked with a few other traders I respect tonight and we can't figure out what would hold this market down though. I was fairly bullish but today's drop sure looked like at least a short term top to me. Now what makes this top significant is that it makes the fork I spoke of the other day still valid just when I thought it was going to not be in play. If you use the 19 July high as the mid tine start point, the 18 October low as the bottom tine and today's high as the top tine start point, the middle tine contains all the previous highs on the DOW, SPX, OEX, NDX, NASDAQ and almost the NYSE although the peaks come a little short on that one. This fork projects a sideways channel for the NASDAQ, NDX and down channels for the other indexes of some signifignace. Now if the Fed were to announce a tightening bias in December, that could dampen spirits in that time frame and a few bad economic reports could get fears going for a week or two before the meeting but I just don't see anything to hold us back for the next 3 weeks news wise. What are we missing? Like I posted this morning, EVERYONE is bullish and proclaiming the sky isn't even a limit anymore. I literally got shivers down my spine when that guy (a "professional") said there was no such thing as an over priced stock. The stage is set, what is the spark? Oil prices, commodities, a war with Russia, Natural disaster? Heck wars are seen as bullish now and if an earthquake hit silicon valley, they would probably spin it as bullish due to rebuilding requirements for AMAT or else bid up competing companies that are located elsewhere. Also I will try to find the story in print but there was a spot on TV about some guy that apparently came up with a Y2K fix years ago and got a patent on it then kept his mouth shut. Now 40 days before Y2K, he suddenly remembers he has this patent and wants payment in billions for the fix that was used by 80% of Fortune 500 companies and that IBM already admitted using for fixing all their clients systems. This could possibly become big IMO as lawsuits could shoot up all over the place. EDIT found one version of the story here.... Friday November 12 08:30 PM EST Y2K fix: The price just went up Joe Belden, ZDNet A popular Y2K fix may end up giving companies the shock of the century. The inventor of the technique known as "windowing" is sending out bills for thousands, and in some cases millions, of dollars. "Windowing" is a quick and cheap solution. It tricks computers into interpreting certain numbers (such as "00" through "29") as belonging to the 21st Century. Larger numbers are interpreted as 20th Century dates. The Giga Information Group estimates it is used by as many as nine out of ten companies to make sure their systems recognize dates beyond 1999. Few of them are aware that Boeing Co. software developer Bruce Dickens holds the patent. Now he has begun sending letters to Fortune 500 companies, asking for royalties. He wants payments based on company revenues, with the price going up 100 times after the first of the year. That means a company taking in $1 billion a year would have to pay $2.5 million. Kazim Isfahani, an industry analyst with Giga Information, says he expects the companies will reject the demand for money. He notes that some government agencies used windowing in the 1960s to fix software that used only one digit for the year. See this story in context on ZDNet dailynews.yahoo.com Good Luck, Lee PS - KM, CMGI was a pick at my site yesterday also, and I had it as a pick for a few days last week in the 90s <ggg>

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (33608)	11/18/1999 12:12:00 AM
From: flatsville	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

biz.yahoo.com Fair Use/etc... Wednesday November 17, 7:10 pm Eastern Time Fed's Y2K liquidity measures keep markets calm By Ross Finley NEW YORK, Nov 17 (Reuters) - While the Federal Reserve has financial markets guessing whether Tuesday's interest-rate increase may be the last for several months, the central bank has taken great pains to quell fears about year-end liquidity. The Fed has put in place a series of measures to make sure markets work smoothly when the clocks on the world's computers change over to 2000 and investors decide whether to hold their positions or convert to cash because of fears of technology-related disruptions on the financial markets. New York Federal Reserve Bank President William McDonough affirmed on Wednesday that the Fed had ''gone a long way'' toward addressing year-end liquidity fears that peaked in August and September of this year. Analysts, economists, market players and primary dealers -- the firms that conduct securities transactions with the New York Fed -- agreed. ''It's certainly been useful -- it's a valuable backstop to have there. The mere fact that the Fed has been so aggressive has been helpful,'' said Lou Crandall, chief economist at R.H. Wrightson & Associates. Economists also say market interest in the Fed's new liquidity insurance scheme means investors are approaching the issue calmly rather than with panic. Until the Fed came to the rescue, many investors said they were content to park money in safe, liquid short-term U.S. Treasuries and keep their money away from riskier assets such as stocks or debt from corporations and government-sponsored agencies. If that occurred, it might have led to a liquidity squeeze similar to what was seen last year at this time. Instead, stocks have rallied and so-called spread products have also performed rather well. But many analysts added that the bond market's resilience running into the last quarter before the date changes to 2000 is only partly a result of the Fed's preemptive measures. Crandall cited the concern several months ago in the corporate bond and mortgage-backed markets about widening of spreads -- which indicated a preference by investors for Treasuries, securities which are much easier to turn over in the event of a crisis. ''We've seen liquidity in lots of other markets hold up,'' Crandall said. ''The corporate bond market had this expectation spreads would widen dramatically and they haven't.'' One of the Fed's main tools in fighting Y2K fears is STRIPs options -- securities that allow dealers to cash in the value of the option on one of three maturity dates offered. This ability to exchange STRIPs for cash readily if needed is the kind of safety net prudent dealers crave as insurance against a year-end liquidity crunch. The December 30 maturity date, two days before computer clocks change over, has met the highest demand. The other two maturities are December 23 and January 6. The Fed has auctioned five separate offerings of STRIPs since October 20, all of which have generated widespread interest, according to the New York Fed. ''There has been a tremendous amount of interest in the options auctions that have taken place,'' the New York Fed's McDonough said on Wednesday. Analysts say that with five of seven STRIPs options auctions already behind them -- totaling just over $370 billion -- many market players who were concerned about cash on hand at year-end have already taken out their respective millennium insurance policies and are now sitting comfortably. Citing strong demand, the Fed on November 4 added two additional STRIPs auctions to the original total of five and said it could add more if there were a further strengthening in demand. The Fed has twice increased the amount of securities offered in individual auctions, also citing increased demand. But the amounts offered in the November 17 auctions decreased slightly, indicating the market may be more confident about year-end cash flows. ''In terms of why they were recently cut back, I would say it could reflect a number of things -- perhaps some greater confidence in the market about Y2K itself and how it will go,'' said Spence Hilton, associate vice president at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. In addition to the STRIPs auctions, the New York Fed also announced in September that it would begin entering into repurchase transactions with maturities up to 90 days, up from the previous maximum period of 60 days. The Fed has already tied up approximately $30 billion in long-term repurchase agreements, a further reinforcement against liquidity concerns in the repo market. ''The only risk at this point is customers -- and by that I mean mutual funds having large withdrawals at the end of the term,'' said Marc Wanshel, economist at J.P. Morgan & Co. ''But the dealers, I think, are very comfortable.'' Vincent Verterano, head government bond trader at Nomura Securities International, said the STRIPs options provide good insurance for dealers who need extra liquidity toward year-end. But he underlined that insurance doesn't come for free. ''The Fed's going to make a ton of money on this,'' Verterano said. ''Chances are they (the options) are not going to be exercised.'' The interest rate on options is 150 basis points (1-1/2 percentage points) above the Federal funds rate, now at 5.50 percent, but traders see the insurance as cheap. Before Wednesday's auction, the total amount the Fed had received in premiums was ''just shy of $5 million -- a little bit more with today's sale,'' Hilton said. Many traders say that the premium is a small price to pay for what amounts to peace of mind running up to the new year. In addition to the options auctions, The Fed now accepts a broader range of collateral for its open market repurchase operations. And it introduced in September a special facility to ease pressure on smaller regional banks toward year-end. Despite the fact few banks have stepped forward and used the facility, Crandall and other analysts acknowledged that the very fact the Fed made the liquidity facility available to small banks if they needed it was a positive step forward.