Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (34179)	11/17/1999 9:55:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

CT:Publicly no. But don't tell me they embarked on this witch hunt without first checking withBill with a C. I suppose you think Rambo Bill C. wasn't in on Waco. If this is purely judicial why would the WH want any involvement. Didn't look like it helped Gore one bit the other night and the place was full of liberals. How are the real people going to feel about this, putting the side the psuedo intellectuals and the media? JFD

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (34179)	11/18/1999 2:17:00 AM
From: Gerald Walls	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Read it again. It says "Until now, administration officials said, White House officials have had no involvement in the Microsoft case." Maybe you missed that part. ...(While shaking finger in your face): "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky."... ...Travelgate... ...Soliciting campaign funds in the White House... ...Chinagate... ...IRS audits of enemies, like Paula Jones... ..."No controlling legal authority"... ..."That depends on what the definition of 'is' is."... Do you really believe any statement carried by the foul breath that escapes their lips?