Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (63607)	11/18/1999 2:45:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Well, you aren't statistically significant.

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (63607)	11/18/1999 2:47:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 108807

I know we agree. My point was the the "pro choice" folk are big on preserving "choices" but not on accepting the consequences as they may affect other lives. JLA

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (63607)	11/18/1999 2:50:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

But thats the problem nulldog, with a lot of these guys... sounds like you included... you weren't pro-life until you met your wife... Warren Beatty certainly wasn't pro-life until recently... I wonder if those guys in the dorm next door (who talked about womens body parts, date rape, and how many times they "made it" in a week ENDLESSLY) are now pro-life 15 years later - they certainly weren't then! lol Just because something becomes convenient for you does not make it any more relevant for anybody else. Unwanted pregnancies generally happen to women when they are young, unmarried, or both. If a man is going to be pro-life, I'd like it to be when they are young and unmarried, not afterward, when it is irrelevant. jmo