Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : SI Spammer Hall of Fame -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Bob who wrote (1055)	11/19/1999 10:02:00 PM
From: Tom C	Respond to of 4105

You decide... Member 7621396 Posts are all different but seem geared toward selling a service. Tom

To: SI Bob who wrote (1055)	11/21/1999 11:10:00 AM
From: If only I'd held	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4105

This is the kind of activity that makes me want my money back from SI. Message 12002768 Talk about spam? This guy is a shameless liar. Look at some of the responses... Message 12003026 Message 12003400 Message 12003686 Message 12003835 (He would have to wait till I was done with him) Message 12004550 (Bob, can you help us out here?) Message 12004654 This is all he has to say in his defense after burning some folks out of their money. Yes, we are talking real money here. Message 12026193 And my response to him..... Message 12029597 Bob, I paid 200 bucks for a lifetime membership to SI to get access to conversation with some of the sharpest and most informd investors in the world. Perhaps I have set my sights too high, but I have come to regard SI as a place where this type of thing isn't tolerated. There has to be some line or boundary of ethics that SI members know they shouldn't cross. This guy crossed that line of there is one. I beleive he should be punished for his behavior. Perhaps a blemished reputation is punishment enough, but maybe a week off would make him see that what he did was wrong. He owes the thread an apology, and I don't beleive he has any intention of providing one. Therefore, I don't think he knows what he did was wrong. Sometimes folks, no matter how old they are, need someone to teach them right from wrong. Would you mind providing this guy with a lesson? Thanks.

To: SI Bob who wrote (1055)	11/23/1999 9:26:00 AM
From: Phil(bullrider)	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4105

Bob, Check this person out. 127.0.0.1:3456/SI/~wsapi/investor/personalprofile-7393734 To: +Anthony@Pacific (0 ) From: +Jor-El Tuesday, Nov 23 1999 9:18AM ET Reply # of 46723 VIAD NEWS "Hot Company to Watch" Check it out quote.yahoo.com Buy now or cry later! 127.0.0.1:3456/SI/~wsapi/investor/reply-12063378 Have fun, Phil Edit: I see Barb beat me to it.

To: SI Bob who wrote (1055)	11/26/1999 12:44:00 AM
From: Phil(bullrider)	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4105

Bob, I know I have nominated this poster before, and it may seem I am harassing him, but check him out. His posts are continuous hype, on the same companies, but he changes them enough to beat the spambot. 127.0.0.1:3456/SI/~wsapi/investor/personalprofile-4428251 Have fun, Phil

To: SI Bob who wrote (1055)	11/30/1999 10:54:00 PM
From: CatLady	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4105

Spamming BryanB on his ThinkTank thread (and around 10 other threads) Message 12150475 LOL To: BryanB (0 ) From: el vez Tuesday, Nov 30 1999 10:45PM ET Reply # of 170 SI's BEST STOCKER PICKER Place your vote here b412/31/99: Subject 31977

To: SI Bob who wrote (1055)	2/1/2000 6:03:00 PM
From: CatLady	Respond to of 4105

Hi Bob, are you back yet? 'Cause Jon Scott is back, with a new ID and is advertising his newsletter again #reply-12737124 Yes, I know I'm supposed to email Jill while you're gone, but my ISPs' email server seems to be kaput.