Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Zi-Corp (ZICA), formerly MCUAF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr. Seuss who wrote (1730)	11/19/1999 6:29:00 PM
From: Diogeron	Respond to of 2082

<Therefore, he shouldn't be surprised if one of us occasionally picks it up and lobs it back at him.> Please note the phrase, "one of us". I'm surprised you viewed my e-mail as uncivil. Having said that, this is the last posting I will make on this subject because I see no value added by these non-substantive exchanges between us. As to your other comment, "Doesn't change the facts", I would only ask, "What 'facts"? It is precisely my point that unlike your fellow Short, BFB, you give no facts at all, merely rants and labels (pump and dump stock, etc.) You would do us all a favor if you would provide us with those "facts" to assist us in our decision making processes. I can't speak for others on this thread, but I have no special emotional attachment to Zi. If you can provide a persuasive argument (I use the term advisedly) for shorting this stock, I'll admit I'm wrong and do it. I'm in this to make money, not cheerlead for a particular stock. The bottom line is, of course, that the events of the past few months put the burden of proof on you to tell us why we're wrong. After all, I've made about $20 grand since July being long on this stock. I'd be happy to make another twenty shorting the stock if you can give us anything other than adjectives upon which to base that decision. QED.