SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kash johal who wrote (80513)11/19/1999 4:29:00 PM
From: Charles R  Respond to of 1571785
 
Kash,

<Why not an AMD brand.>

That would piss off some OEMs big time. IMHO, not worth the risk.

<I doubt if there's enough money for another tier.>

Don't know about that. Second tier brands seem to be doing OK by getting into bed with large retail outlets. I don't expect these guys to break into big leagues but have a place in the ecosystem feeding off the tiny niches they see. The whole business is probably not much but at the volume level AMD operates, even the guy standing 20th in market share cannot be ignored.

<Lets see if they can do something innovative.>

Yes, I agree. They seem to have come up with a nice product-idea that seems saleable. The marketing needs to show some creativity to make something big out of it.

Chuck



To: kash johal who wrote (80513)11/19/1999 4:36:00 PM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571785
 
Kash,

I am glad you could get of the Intel position without much damage. Hope that doesn't end the hot streak you got going with AMD and RMBS. Good luck to you DELL and ALTR.

Chuck



To: kash johal who wrote (80513)11/19/1999 5:39:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571785
 
Kash - RE: "Why not an AMD brand."

I don't want AMD pissing of CPQ, IBM, HP, and everyone else!