SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tecinvestor who wrote (23180)11/19/1999 4:58:00 PM
From: JC Jaros  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Scrap the Testosterosa. Get an old yellow truck. You can haul cool stuff and it's easy to find in the parking lot.

-JCJ



To: Tecinvestor who wrote (23180)11/19/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: QwikSand  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
And, QS, scrap the Viper. Get a Testa Rossa.

Sorry, you're talking to the wrong guy. I have a sentimental thing about buying American cars.

As for the West Side in the 60's, it's nice there but they have that Sony theater where the audience talks during the movie. Or maybe that's just New Yorkers in general<g>.

--QS



To: Tecinvestor who wrote (23180)11/20/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: QwikSand  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 64865
 
TI: On a less automotive note, the CNBS stated party line today became this: since Judge Jackson is now pushing for a settlement, M$ stock is going to go through the roof and "competitors such as Sun Microsystems" are going to take a hit.

I wonder how many dollars of Microsoft legal troubles are priced into SUNW stock, and how much of the recent SUNW run-up is for "sun.com" reasons, as twister might say (only I would say it with less sarcasm). I think most of it is the latter, but we'll find out next week.

IMHO as a lay spectator, while a settlement would indeed push M$FT up a lot, there's still almost no chance of it happening anytime soon. The M$FT mantra of "We'd love to settle as long as we can continue to innovate and do what's best for our customers" looks to me like very thinly disguised code for "We'll sign a meaningless 'cross-our-hearts-and-hope-to-die' token settlement, but we will not give one inch on any substantive issue such a a breakup or publication of core IP." There's reasons why a waiting game is M$FT's best play. A newly-elected administration's DOJ might settle on easy terms. Things in the computer industry could change to the point where M$FT could argue convincingly that no meaningful remedies to the original violations remain available.

I don't see what the downside is to them holding out, but I would very much like to know your opinion.

Regards,
--QwikSand