Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Newbridge Networks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (14844)	11/23/1999 11:43:00 AM
From: Hagar	Respond to of 18016

Why do you take these things personally. I made no derision of NN equipment. I made no claims on ASND/LU equipment. I tried to point out that your comparisons such as 50 is better than 25 mean nothing until you break down what those numbers mean. This 50/320 may be the greatest thing ever. I have yet to see any reference to what the 50 and 320 mean (I can guess). As such I cannot claim that it better than any other equipment and and certainly would not claim it will replace boxes out there. By the way your reply by way of some "knowledeable" emailer means nothing to mean. The argument that one card has four physical ports counters someones density claims is supposed to be proof by example. I believe the density claim refers to things like the number of DS0s/DS1s terminated on a card. And I like the excuse "NN is really better but bad management is to blame" Am I supposed to interpret this as proof that NN is a better equipment supplier. And the third point- you would hope vendors build what customers ask for. Who cares if you or Tera Bit think its wrong because NNs "swiss army switch" seems more elegant. That product is apparently NOT what some customers wanted.