SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: charred who wrote (12321)11/20/1999 10:33:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14627
 
charred, With a tight seamless rock, like quartzite you need to find an exposed bit of metal for the leach fluid to remove that entire bit. Quartzite, as the name implies, is glasslike and when you crush the rock you will need more crushing to a smaller size to make sure you expose 90%+ of the gold grains to the leach liquid. Alkali helps this as it does attack quartz slowly. Quartzite can also be very tough to grind and this extra energy to girnd it is a cost that needs to be determined by grinding tests. Suphidation also has a tendency to encapsulate gold grains in iron/arsenic pyrite shells that are immune to the leach fluid and they need to be oxidised by a furnace or a autoclave or by a bacterial oxidation stage in a heap leach. The grade determines the approach as costs vary with leach being the cheapest, slowest and lowest efficiency.
Often sulphide rocks need a flotation stage to concentrate the gold bearing sulphide particles because they are what needs the oxidation and there is no point in wasting heat and furnace time on barren rock.
Bill



To: charred who wrote (12321)11/22/1999 10:24:00 AM
From: Quickdraw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14627
 
charred,

Thanks for the explanation and yes I saw the BAY recommendation by Cannacord. They seem to think highly of both properties.

Both seem to be on the move again today.
207.102.62.28
207.102.62.28

Qd