Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (63739)	11/20/1999 11:57:00 PM
From: MSB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I do, however, believe that any man who has sex with a woman not his wife has no right to condemn women for having abortions. He has no way of knowing whether the woman became pregnant, or what happened. And this includes sex with prostitutes, who are women in my book. Well, I hate to admit it, but you do have a point in so far as the part about males having sex outside of marriage. However, males are not the only guilty party to all probability which is what I believe most believe even if they do not care to admit it. An unwanted pregnancy by way of an act of simple gratification should not release either party from responsibility when it comes right down to it. So imo, an abortion is as much a wrongful act by both parties even though only one party must physically endure it. And this means even if he used a condom, which are only 80% effective. If he screwed around outside of marriage, even once, he's got no right to condemn others. Since I'm the one which made mention of using condoms most recently, I am lead to believe that the above highlighted paragraph is referencing me, unless you'd like to say different. But you can set your mind at ease with the last "if" since I have never broken my vows to my wife physically. Imagining is another story all together.