SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jmac who wrote (51243)11/22/1999 3:38:00 AM
From: RoseCampion  Respond to of 152472
 
But, I don't understand your example of a credit spread. Long Jan 2001 380 puts, short the April 370 puts. This would not result in a credit but a debit.

There's a good reason you don't understand - you're right. <g> I knew it was too good to be true. I'd basically set some volatility-averaging options that caused OptionVue to think that the average implied volatilities for all options as they are now would apply later on, whenever I went to sell the long Jan01 puts. Since near-term options have massive IVs right now, but the LEAPs don't nearly as much, that really put some recreational pharmacutical-style input into the pricing models. Very long story short, it thought I could buy the Jan2001 380 puts today and sell them for a 30-point profit tomorrow, even if the stock hadn't change in price in the interim. This would tend to...um, slightly skew its conception of the "most profitable" strategy. <vVbg>

Not that I would have traded on the basis of its "recommendation" (but I did get a bit excited for a moment <g>).

Note to others: See how important implied volatility is to option prices?

Note to self: when any person, or any program, tells you that anything related to an investment has a 90% probability of profit, you should instantly assume it's a complete lie.

jmac, Thanks for pointing my blooper out to me - and kids, don't try that particular trade at home. Or anywhere.

-Rose-