SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Apollo who wrote (10889)11/22/1999 1:05:00 AM
From: Apollo  Respond to of 54805
 
Lucent and Wireless?????

wirelessweek.com

Lucent Promises More Growth, R&D

By Monica Alleven

MURRAY HILL, N.J.--The best is yet to come.

That's the message from Lucent, which recently hosted its annual meetings with analysts and media at its sprawling campus here. The $38 billion company, once the stodgy old equipment arm of AT&T Corp., has transformed itself into a sizzling, techno-savvy beast, growing exponentially since its initial public offering in April 1996. Along the way, the company has muscled up with 29 acquisitions while maintaining close ties to Bell Labs, the Nobel Prize laureate-producing research division. In 1999, Lucent announced more than 148 contracts, and its revenue grew 20.4 percent. Not bad for a 3-year-old.

One of Lucent's hottest growth areas is wireless, a business AT&T actually considered getting out of in the early '90s. Luckily for Lucent, it didn't. Wireless accounted for more than $5.5 billion in contract wins in 1999 alone. Led by wireless guru Jim Brewington, Lucent's wireless division has managed to outdo Ericsson in TDMA infrastructure in North America, and Lucent remains the worldwide leader in CDMA infrastructure, with 46 percent market share. Lucent even has some contract wins in the Ericsson-dominated GSM market. The wireless market is steadily growing, and Lucent is gaining ground in key areas such as Asia, Central America, Latin America and the Middle East.

Where does Lucent go next? Today, 95 percent of wireless network traffic is voice, and that traffic is increasing. But by 2005, Lucent expects 50 percent of the traffic will be data, as wireless increasingly is used to access the Internet. That means Lucent has to be on the cutting edge of next-generation technologies.

"We're investing a ton of money in third generation, and we're on schedule with our third-generation development," says Brewington, president of Lucent's Network Wireless Group. (In fact, Brewington claims the title of biggest spender at Lucent, where wireless R&D is approaching the $2 billion mark. At a recent meeting, colleagues teased him by playing Peggy Lee's "Big Spender" song.)

Brewington, a wireless enthusiast who says his passion over the development of a wireless base station once tested a marriage, promises even more wireless breakthroughs to come. The company has third-generation trials now under way in all the major wireless technologies, including an important Universal Mobile Telecommunications System trial with Japan's NTT DoCoMo.

Yet Lucent isn't without its challenges, both within wireless and in other business areas. Lucent executives, without specifying a time frame, have told analysts their goal is to make Lucent the No. 1 global provider of wireless infrastructure--but stealing market share away from Ericsson and other competitors won't be easy. Ericsson still dominates in GSM, the technology used across Europe. Other competitors are vying for wireless business, too, including Nortel Networks, Nokia and Siemens--and rival Motorola has a partnership with IP powerhouse Cisco Systems.

In other areas, Lucent's enterprise data division has "flatlined" while other segments are growing. In enterprise data, "we're an afterthought," says Lucent Chairman and CEO Richard McGinn, making an analogy between Lucent's standing in the enterprise market to the credits of a movie: "We're down there along with best boy and key grip."

But he says Lucent won't try to "out-Cisco Cisco," its biggest rival in the enterprise networking and voice-over-IP markets. Instead, Lucent will focus on up-and-coming areas such as optical networking.

Meanwhile, many Wall Street analysts are optimistic about Lucent's long-term wireless outlook. ABN-AMRO analysts estimate dramatic growth--40 percent to 50 percent growth in fiscal 2000.

Lehman Brothers analyst Tim Luke agrees Lucent is on a winning path. "They're very well placed in wireless; they're being very competitive in vendor financing," he says.

No doubt, wireless infrastructure will be play a key role in Lucent's future. Fortunately, AT&T didn't scrap that wireless business after all.



To: Apollo who wrote (10889)11/22/1999 1:28:00 AM
From: Apollo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
Qualcomm & Wireless Broadband: HDR...

Best explanation I've seen on High Data Rate; from Andrew Seybold site on Wireless Roadmap; must register (free), ....below is snippet:

Apollo

wirelessroadmap.com

"HDR Roadmap
Qualcomm announced two HDR chips for handsets. They are both 100% compatible with their existing chip set. This allows handset manufacturers to literally stuff the board with one of the new chips instead of the current chip and have a HDR handset. The ease for handset providers to bring a HDR product to market is a significant winning factor for HDR compared to GSM/TDMA GPRS and EDGE based technologies.

The first chip, called the iMSM 4500, supports HDR, IS-95A and IS-95B. IS-95A is the current cdmaOne technology used throughout the world. IS-95B is a version of cdmaOne that supports 64 Kbps data and is being implemented this year and early next year in Korea and Japan. It appears that US operators will pass on upgrading to IS-95B and go directly to 1X. The iMSM 4500 is scheduled for full production in Q1 of 2001. I would expect HDR handsets based on the iMSM 4500 to be available in Q2 2001.

The second chip, iMSM 5500, supports HDR and 1X technologies. It is set for production in Q3 of 2001 with HDR/1X handsets available by the holidays of 2001. A handset using the iMSM 5500 technologies could easily roam between 1X data systems (153 kbps) and HDR systems (2.4 Mbps). This puts HDR well ahead of EDGE for TDMA and GSM systems (see roadmap).

Conclusion
Qualcomm can hardly lose with wireless data for their existing customers. If a carrier is completely voice-centric and follows the 3G roadmap from cdmaOne to cdma2000 1XRTT to cdma2000 3XRTT, Qualcomm sells them new technology (mainly chips that handset and infrastructure manufacturers use and technology licenses to other chip makers). If the carrier decides to add HDR, Qualcomm also wins. HDR is primarily a competitive offering for CDMA. Qualcomm told me that they will charge the same licensing fees for 1X and HDR, meaning that if a handset has both and costs the customer the same as a 1X-only handset their will be no additional licensing fee for HDR. If the handset manufacturer charges a premium for HDR, the license fee will go up. This clearly sounds like they want to make HDR as price competitive as possible.

The combination of 1X and HDR technologies appear to provide all of the technology capabilities and efficiencies of the ultimate 3G standards. Since both of these technologies are considered to be minor upgrades to existing cdmaOne systems, Qualcomm is providing CDMA operators with 3G capabilities at a fraction of the cost compared to what a GSM or TDMA operator will need to spend on upgrading to 3G (called wideband CDMA or W-CDMA by those operators). This combination of 1X and HDR also beats 3G to market by at least two years?probably three to five years.

Qualcomm is not ?betting the company? on HDR as they did 10 years ago on CDMA?they don?t need to. I hear many voices criticizing HDR for not being a standard and not being on the 3G track. I remind them that CDMA was not a standard 10 years ago either. Do not count HDR out; if it makes the most economic sense to provide 3G capabilities alongside 1X the operators will adopt it. Keep a lookout for HDR trials by operators over the next two years. This will be a bellwether indicator if high-speed wireless data will be widely available by 2002 from CDMA operators."




To: Apollo who wrote (10889)11/22/1999 8:57:00 AM
From: david barr  Respond to of 54805
 
Portfolio

QCOM 40% Gorilla
WAVX 33% ...pre Shiny pebble (can't resist)
CTXS 15% gorilla candidate
GMST 12% gorilla soon....

Dave



To: Apollo who wrote (10889)11/22/1999 3:15:00 PM
From: Len  Respond to of 54805
 
Apollo, Since you asked:

QCOM: 60%
EMC: 20%
NTAP: 10%
GMST: 10%

Len



To: Apollo who wrote (10889)11/22/1999 4:03:00 PM
From: freeus  Respond to of 54805
 
I dont have the percentages yet: do that when I get a chance but I have 12 stocks:
AOL
CMGI
CTXS
Gmst
HD
JDSU
Lu
Msft
Qcom
Tyc
(Qcom calls and LEAPS)
VRTL (which I'll sell as soon as it goes up a little: was a bad choice by a service I subscribe to)
I know that's only 11 but I'm leaving a space for CMGI's next IPO, which I hope will be Alta Vista and which I hope I'll get 100 shares of as I have from their other IPOs (Wit account, used only for IPOs from CMGI has more than tripled from July $2000 has become $7000, all cash since I havent kept any of the IPOs yet...will keep Alta Vista though most likely.)
Freeus



To: Apollo who wrote (10889)11/22/1999 4:22:00 PM
From: Everett D. Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
The first part of this year I was in 13 stocks. Now due to the influence of this thread:
Qcom---66.39%
Jdsu---27.07%
Cash---6.54%
Everett



To: Apollo who wrote (10889)11/22/1999 4:40:00 PM
From: Nichols  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
QCOM-34%,CSCO-13%,JDSU-13%, EMC-7%,SUNW-5%,CMVT-5%,LU-5%,WCOM-3%,GMST,NTAP,MSFT,CREE,
CMGI,TLAB each 2%. Thoughts-we'll all get very rich together, or very poor together.



To: Apollo who wrote (10889)11/24/1999 7:24:00 AM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 54805
 
Would encourage others to list their portfolios for thread interest, if you're comfortable with this.

after personal coaxing by stan, here it is.

stocks.....60% of total portfolio
gmst 33%
cree 33%
imcl 2%
qcom
ntap
emc
sebl
the last four total 32%.

other investments...
i am 40% invested in notes and deeds of trust which i have acquired at substantial discount with average yield 24%.
this is another source of income for me. i carefully reinvest the principal every year.

since retiring, i have taken the following approach.
i put the income i need for each of the next 10 years in fixed instruments. i use mortgages, i think zero coupon bonds would be good for this also (lower yield but less risk). though i have only had one small problem, that was resolved quickly, with my mortgage investing.

this was a very good year for my stocks, and i have just added 3 years. so the next 12 years of my income needs are covered.

the rest goes into growth stocks (hopefully now only gorillas and kings). with 12 years visibility and income protection, i am a very comfortable ltbh in my growth stocks.

i realize this is not true 100% gorilla gaming. i call it comfortable retirement.

i continue to study all three manuals...what a fine piece of work they are...every mistake i ever made in the market is clearly explained...i am sending them to my kids (all in their 30's) for Christmas.
unclewest

wife's portfolio is a bit different...she likes brcm and ibm.