Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (70880)	11/22/1999 6:04:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Les, The Gordon study has forced Wall Street to join forces with the Govt. to declare Gordon nutso. Sad as this is for me to say, the Northwestern professor is making sense while the Wharton professor, Jeremy Siegel, of Dow 36,000 infamy, is the goof. <g>

To: Les H who wrote (70880)	11/22/1999 7:34:00 PM
From: Freedom Fighter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

Les, I'm not so sure why everyone is so focused on what the true productivity figures are. They have little real impact on the values in the stock market. To begin with you have to be crazy to trust them. They are highly subjective and wide open to the usual statistical game playing by vested interests. Second, whatever the true productivity level is, it eventually shows up in the growth of corporate profits and other income streams (although not necessarily evenly). On a peak to peak basis corporate profit growth in the 90s was no faster than is typical of other business cycles. That "only average" performance came despite a few small tail winds (like falling interest rates) and perhaps a generally declining quality of earnings. (options, pensions, writedowns, trading profits) The economy may be changing, but that is nothing new. As Warren Buffet stated recently, cars, radios, televisions, trains, light bulbs, airplanes and many other inventions permanently changed the way we do business and dramatically increased standards of living. If it makes the "Bulls" happy to call every great invention a "new era" then so be it. But the PC, software, and the internet, as much as I love them, don't justify what's going on in the stock market based on current earnings, interest rates, and profit growth prospects. It's a "new era" if your definition of a one is any important change that occurs. (like every 15 years on average) Wayne