Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (9361)	11/22/1999 3:03:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 769670

You mean kind of like you, X and Rambi on feeies? LOL!! JLA

To: Ilaine who wrote (9361)	11/22/1999 3:26:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Not so, of course. Neo and I agree on a lot politically, and I laugh at his jokes if I find them funny. But we disagree on much, as most observers know. <<If he doesn't like someone, you attack them.>> Since I don't remember ever doing this, I wonder if you could cite an example. I think it's a reckless charge that you should either withdraw or show proof.

To: Ilaine who wrote (9361)	11/22/1999 3:38:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

What do you think of the way they implemented the ignore feature? I like the way you can select between public, private, messages to/from etc. (I don't think RB has that)... but the word "ignored" shows up in too many places for my liking. If you do a "show replies" and one of the replies is ignored, it says "this message is ignored"... same if you do a list of the thread. I guess there isn't any other way to do it.