SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Lloyd who wrote (70905)11/22/1999 10:39:00 PM
From: Mike M2  Respond to of 132070
 
Don, good point. In the Industrial economy we could check that more easily. Now with the information age it is much more difficult. My gut feel is the productivity stats are overstated . I'm too tired to think now - we'll argue in the morning -g- Mike



To: Don Lloyd who wrote (70905)11/23/1999 9:11:00 AM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Don,

>>There is no reason to assume that productivity improvements necessarily lead to increased profits. Company
specific productivity improvements that are unavailable to its competitors usually increase profits, but rapid widespread technological change can easily destroy profitability as adaptation becomes necessary for survival, as opposed to generating excess profits.<<

I agree (especially as it relates to the internet). It seems to me that any destruction of profits would be temporary though.

In any event, I wasn't talking about excess profits. (higher returns on capital). I was talking about the economic growth that comes from improved productivity. We essentially monetize productivity and increase the income streams.

Corporate profits tend to track GDP growth within a range over the long haul. But I'm really not interested in what the government says productivity or GDP is. I'm interested in where corporate profits are heading and why. I can measure that and have confidence in those numbers.

Wayne