SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (29797)11/23/1999 9:21:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Respond to of 50167
 
to Ride Internet Higher
individualinvestor.com

Analyst: Bob Hirschfeld (11/22/99)

When Oracle (NASDAQ: ORCL - Quotes, News, Boards) management announced on November 17 that second-quarter sales looked strong, analysts reacted positively, and shares took off, rising over 10%.

CEO Larry Ellison said Oracle?s pipeline is full and software spending hasn?t been slowed by year 2000 concerns.

Oracle is scheduled to report its second quarter earnings on December 10th. Right now there is considerable optimism that the huge database software vendor, with over $9 billion in annual revenue, will produce a very strong quarter. In the last month alone, shares have climbed over 60%.
Like this Article?

However, Oracle management has previously provided over-optimistic counsel -- then failed to deliver.

We last wrote about Oracle on September 15th, after shares missed their whisper number. We found Oracle management ?lacking in credibility,? and deplored the high multiple (then 40), given Oracle?s long-term decline in revenue growth and lack of earnings consistency.

We wondered why so many analysts were reiterating their bullishness. It turns out they were right to do so.

Oracle is a difficult company to analyze.

A quick check at the Bloomberg terminal confirms that numerous analysts have provided late counsel, both as to their upgrades and downgrades. When we asked Alex Kotlyar of CE Unterberg, Towbin, why that was the case, the analyst said the difficulties stemmed from Oracle?s inconsistent quarterly reports and from the complexity of its numerous software businesses.

Asked whether things were changing, Kotlyar said Oracle has transitioned from a database vendor into a ?complete software solution? company, adding that such recent products as its business-to-business (B2B) exchange puts it in the frame of such hot companies as Ariba (NASDAQ: ARBA - Quotes, News, Boards) and Commerce One (NASDAQ: CMRC - Quotes, News, Boards).

And that, in turn, has spurred Oracle?s ?recent breakout into new multiple territory.? (He?s not kidding. If you compare Oracle?s first quarter ending August, with expectations for November, the multiple on earnings jumped from 40 times to 75 times.)

However, a number of developments make Oracle genuinely attractive, no matter how pricey it appears now. One, Oracle appears to be making good on Ellison?s promise of six months ago to strip $1 billion of operating costs by the end of the fiscal year, ending May 2001. If successful, that effort would add about $0.30 per share of earnings.

Neil Herman, the Salomon analyst, recently reiterated his Buy rating, giving as his basic reason the ?tangible evidence? supporting the case for operating margin expansion. Herman finds appealing management?s plan to remove $200 million from Oracle's IT cost structure and additionally drive marketing expenses lower by shifting to an e-commerce model.

Management?s stated intention is to move 80% of sales to the online Oracle Store over the next 18 months. That move, Herman explains, should allow Oracle to drive revenue growth ahead of employee growth, and improve sales productivity and operating margins.

Herman also expects Oracle to shift its revenue mix toward software licensing and away from consulting in its basic database business, which should further improve operating margins. Overall, Herman looks for operating margins to improve to 22.7% this fiscal year, and a further 26.2% in 2001, up from 21.2% a year ago.

But the fire in investors? eyes is more about Oracle?s expansion into Internet-related software than margins. One example: Earlier this month the company announced an agreement to build a market-oriented Internet site, called World AutoXchange, on which Ford Motor (NYSE: F - Quotes, News, Boards) and its suppliers could post prices and gauge demand, thereby saving both Ford and its suppliers money.

Doug Crook, the Prudential Securities analyst, notes that Oracle is the only ERP (enterprise resource planning) software vendor completely integrated for both front-end and back-end,? offering both customer relations management (CRM) and supply chain management (SCM) applications that are completely built around the Internet.

Crook claims that Oracle has increased its ERP market share at the expense of Baan (NASDAQ: BAANF - Quotes, News, Boards), SAP (NYSE: SAP - Quotes, News, Boards), and Peoplesoft (NASDAQ: PSFT - Quotes, News, Boards) and observes that Oracle ?is becoming a showcase for its own software,? driving customer interest.

Operating margins, vertical exchanges and Internet leverage off an ERM client base are all solid positives. According to Kotlyar, given the upside in licensing revenue off its database business and multiple expansion on its rapidly growing Internet-revenue, estimated at 15%-20% currently, ?Oracle shares could well trade into the $80s and $90s.?

As e-commerce becomes a bigger part of Oracle?s business, the key question remains whether markets will value it more like Ariba (NASDAQ: ARBA - Quotes, News, Boards) and Commerce One (NASDAQ: CMRC - Quotes, News, Boards) or more like a traditional enterprise software provider.

Right now Oracle is trading at 11.3 times fiscal 2000 revenue estimates, a substantial premium to Baan (NASDAQ: BAANF - Quotes, News, Boards) and PeopleSoft (NASDAQ: PSFT - Quotes, News, Boards) at approximately 3.7 times, and a substantial discount to Ariba and Commerce One, each trading at over 100 times fiscal 2000 revenue forecasts.

So far the markets have been hesitant to award ?old-line? technology companies such stellar multiples. We believe the underlying logic of this view is that this ?brave new world? requires a new approach that is not encumbered by traditional ways of thinking.

Newer, smaller companies are able to adjust more rapidly to new developments in a market that is constantly changing. Furthermore, skilled IT personnel are increasingly short in supply, and newer ?dot.coms? have been more successful in attracting and retaining employees through stock options.

The counterpoint to this argument is that established players such as Oracle have tremendous installed bases and financial resources that they can leverage it to support new e-commerce initiatives. A recent Oracle ad in a leading financial magazine noted that 98% of e-commerce companies use Oracle databases.

Bottom Line:

We tend to favor the former view, and doubt that companies like Oracle will ever receive the multiples reserved for newer players like Commerce One. Nevertheless, we believe Oracle is among the better positioned of the mature enterprise players to take advantage of the emergence of the Internet, and would expect continued appreciation of the shares over the long-term. Oracle was recently at $76.50.




To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (29797)11/23/1999 9:27:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
TAUB TALK: Why AT&T Will Rock the Wireless World TODAY
I. I. A N A L Y S I S

Medical Advisory Systems & NAPCO Security Systems

DID YOU MISS A DAY?
Last 7 Days Archived

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





individualinvestor.com

editor: Steve Taub 11/22/99

AT&T (NYSE: T - Quotes, News, Boards) is about to stir up the wireless industry.

By the time the wheeling and dealing settles, shares of AT&T, Western Wireless (NASDAQ: WWCA - Quotes, News, Boards) and Lucent Technologies (NYSE: LU - Quotes, News, Boards) will all be much higher than they are today.
Like this Article?

That?s the message PaineWebber sent to clients early Monday morning.

As a result, shares of AT&T and Western jumped up at the opening on Monday. AT&T rose $2.88 to $49.63 while Western moved up $4.19 to $57.25.

However, PaineWebber?s analysts think these two stocks as well as Lucent?s, which is down on Monday, have a lot further to run.

Why?

Analyst Eric Strumingher thinks that AT&T will announce that it is creating a tracking stock for its wireless operations at its December 6 analyst meeting.

This would make AT&T Wireless more acquisitive. A likely target: Western Wireless, predicts PaineWebber analyst Walter Piecyk.

More wireless tracking stocks will mean more wireless capital spending. Good news for Lucent, says PaineWebber analyst Walter Piecyk.

Let?s start with AT&T.

Strumingher feels AT&T needs to jump-start its stock, which has been trading in the $40?s, down from the $60?s back in the spring.

So, he thinks the creation of a tracking stock will unlock the hidden value of AT&T Wireless. He thinks it is worth $60 billion, or $20 per pro forma share, figuring it would trade at 20 times 2000 cash flow (EDITDA), which he estimates will come in at about $3 billion. This year he expects AT&T Wireless EBITDA to top $1.8 billion.

As a contrast, Sprint PCS (NYSE: PCS - Quotes, News, Boards) has a market value of $36 billion. But Strumingher estimates its enterprise value of $45 ?despite having less than half of AT&T?s customers, a lower value per subscriber and expected EBITDA losses of $1.8 billion this year versus AT&T Wireless,? according to the analyst?s notes to clients.

Interestingly, Sprint PCS is down $3.60 to $89.84 on Monday.

Why would a tracking stock boost AT&T?

The wireless operation could invest without worrying whether it would hurt the overall company. It would be easier to attract employees. And it would make it easier for the wireless operation to make acquisitions.

Which brings us to Western Wireless. Analyst Piecyk thinks that if AT&T Wireless is on the hunt, a likely target would be Western.

Why?

AT&T Wireless?s cash flow margins have come under pressure and one main reason is because it must shell out roaming charges to rural-oriented companies like Western.

These roaming revenue, on the other hand, have helped to boost Western?s growth.

Piecyk?s projected value for Western: $100 a share, based on a 23 multiple on his 2001 cash flow estimate. Meantime, he?s raised his target price to $75 from $65.

Wow!

Which brings us to Lucent.

Basically, Piecyk thinks the telecom equipment company, which was spun off from AT&T earlier in the decade, believes that an independent AT&T Wireless would lift spending by an additional $1 billion, to $3 billion.

This would add $0.03 a share to his 2000 Lucent estimate or more than 200 basis points to his 2000 earnings per share growth rate.

?Earlier this year AT&T increased its capital spending to $2 billion from $1 billion, due to larger than expected usage and subscriber growth resulting from strong industry growth and its One Rate plan,? he notes in this morning?s notes.

He adds that Lucent is the primary beneficiary of increased capital spending by Western Wireless, enjoying a 60% share of Western?s expenditures.

His 12-month price target: $100, based on a multiple of 50 times his calendar 2000 estimate of $2 per share.