SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles Tutt who wrote (23324)11/23/1999 4:15:00 PM
From: John Mireley  Respond to of 64865
 
Intel - PIII feeding on it's cash cow Xeon.

Message 12070450



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (23324)11/23/1999 7:44:00 PM
From: paul  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
From Forbes Magazine

forbes.com

Day Trading

Do you sit around in your underwear staring at stock charts, profit projections and instantly updated quotes? Is this behavior ruining your marriage and/or your
bank account? Then you had better take this test.

Are You an Addict?

1. I am preoccupied with daily information about my trades or I am preoccupied with thoughts of past and future trades.

2. A major reason I trade is to escape worries, pressures, anxiety, depression.

3. I experience extreme highs when I win and extreme lows when I lose.

4. I feel uncomfortable with accumulated cash in my account and have an urgent need to keep it in action.

5. I am restless or irritable when unable to trade. For example, when short of money, away on vacation or trying to cut back.

6. I need to increase the amount traded to maintain the high or the excitement.

7. My investments or trades are increasingly speculative or risky.

8. I have more money at risk in the markets than I can afford to lose.

9. I often engage in high-volume trading, to outguess the direction of the market.

10. My trades are highly leveraged.

11. I do not open brokerage statements to avoid having to think about my losses.

12. I borrow money from family, friends, credit cards or other sources to trade.

13. I have not yet paid back the money.

14. I have had someone else provide money to relieve a trading crisis.

15. I have lied to hide my trading or how much money was involved.

16. When losses pile up, I increase my bets in an effort to recoup the losses.

17. I want to stop trading but do not think I can, or I am unsuccessful when I try to control, cut back or stop.

18. I risk losing or have lost work, family or other commitments by dint of the time and money taken up by my trading.

19. I committed an illegal act to get money to trade or to pay back a loan for my trading.

20. I wonder whether I am gambling excessively in the markets.

Scoring your YES answers:
0 - No gambling problem
1 or 2 - Possible future problem
3 or 4 - Mild current problem
5 or 6 - Moderate current problem
7 or more - Severe current problem
Source: Connecticut Council on Problem Ga



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (23324)11/23/1999 7:46:00 PM
From: paul  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
And a slightly more upbeat article from Forbes..

forbes.com

IBM blames its weak sales on the millennium. The bigger problem is a certain competitor in the server business.

Y2Many

By Daniel Lyons &nbspNext

IT MADE LITTLE SENSE IN SEPTEMBER when IBM Chairman Louis V. Gerstner Jr. tapped services chief Samuel Palmisano, the insider most likely to succeed
him, to run IBM's server business. Why take the head of a booming $33-billion-a-year unit and have him run a $9 billion division that schleps big iron to banks
and insurers?

The answer emerged in October: IBM's server business is in serious trouble. Revenue from mainframes, which account for 40% of IBM's server business, plunged
40% in the third quarter and will be hurting for the next two quarters. Enter Palmisano, 48, IBM's best closer. A 26-year insider, he took over IBM's booming
services business in early 1998 after a 22-month stint running the PC division. Palmisano won't talk about his plans for reviving the server business. It will be a
struggle.

The party line in Armonk, N.Y. is that customers have frozen orders to buckle down for the Y2K changeover. That is partly true--but companies are still buying
plenty of computers, especially to open up shop on the Web. Hundreds of new, power-hungry accounts, the dot.coms, are installing new iron, too.

They're buying the iron from Sun Microsystems. Despite IBM's drive to make itself the king of e-business, Sun, in Mountain View, Calif., has the more legitimate
claim to the throne. "IBM has a problem, but it's not Y2K. It's called Sun," says John Shoemaker, who runs Sun's server division. Hard numbers on Web market
share are difficult to come by, but a recent survey of Internet service providers found that 13% chose Sun as their primary server vendor; only 3% chose IBM, says
International Data Corp., a research firm based in Framingham, Mass.

Sun's Sparc servers are powerful, reliable and cheap, and Sun has done a better job of marketing to Internet shops. These days a set of slick new Sun servers is part
of the Web pose, like Doc Martens and Buddy Holly eyeglasses. Even some longtimeIBM mainframe accounts use Sun when they buy new gear to run budding
ventures on-line. That could bode ill for IBM's growth long after Y2K has played itself out.

At Exodus Communications, which runs data centers where companies keep their Web servers, about 90% of the 1,700 customers use Sun servers. Only one
customer uses an IBM mainframe, and none uses IBM's RS/6000 Unix server, says Ellen Hancock, a former top IBM executive who now is chief executive at
Exodus, based in Santa Clara, Calif. "Sun pretty much owns the back end," she says.

"The Sun servers simply do not break down. They're like a Honda. Nerds like that."

Lower cost was one reason Ford Motor Co., a big IBM mainframe customer, turned its back on IBM when it went into e-business applications. Ford still adds to
mainframe capacity, but spending on Sun's Unix systems is growing significantly faster, says George Surdu, a tech director at Ford in Dearborn, Mich.

Chase Manhattan Bank, also a big IBM user, isn't spending much money on mainframes this quarter, but the bank recently bought eight Sun E6500 servers, which
sell for up to $1 million each, and two Sun E4500 models that sell for $100,000. Most of Chase's Internet systems are running on Sun, says Gary Moore, chief
information officer at Chase Manhattan Mortgage Co.

Some IBM customers are switching to Sun for core functions. When Allstate Corp. installed an SAP system, it used Sun servers and phased out part of its
IBMmainframe lineup, says Richard Harris, an assistant vice president at the $26 billion insurer in Northbrook, Ill.

The Web surge has helped Sun gain in sales of $1 million-plus systems. Its share of that segment is up three points to 9% in just the first six months of this year. IBM
also picked up a few points in the same period, to 43% , but its share most likely will decline by year-end, says Steve Josselyn, an analyst at IDC.

To be sure, some customers are avoiding hardware purchases as the year closes--but this isn't exactly a surprise. "IBM's reps sit in on our meetings. They always
know where we're going," says Rhys Godwin, Y2K program coordinator at UniGroup, parent company of United Van Lines and Mayflower Transit, in Fenton, Mo.



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (23324)11/24/1999 5:47:00 AM
From: JDN  Respond to of 64865
 
Dear Charles: NO, just means you got to sell your TCC stock!!! Incidentally I note its current PE ratio is under 10? Is that typical of firms in that field? JDN