Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DanZ who wrote (5013)	11/23/1999 7:49:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

{{{{{{{ Yawwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnn }}}}}}}}}

To: DanZ who wrote (5013)	11/24/1999 3:23:00 AM
From: Druss	Respond to of 10293

Dan--I disagree with your interpretation of why AJIC dropped the article. I felt from reading the reason given they were not happy with the way GUMM was using the news to further their own ends. I think they were feeling used. I also feel this is a death blow to GUMM ever getting the article published in a scientific journal. This will IMHO alienate the scientific community. All of this is opinion but while you are tending to be more positive about the withdrawl of publication I think GUMM dropped the ball and badly. I have not had nor have a position in GUMM All the Best Druss