SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: allen menglin chen who wrote (5017)11/23/1999 8:11:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
Yeah right. I think it would be more appropriate to call VLNC the Qualcomm of Fantasyland.



To: allen menglin chen who wrote (5017)11/23/1999 8:34:00 PM
From: Phil(bullrider)  Respond to of 10293
 
To all:

In a couple of ways, Valence is similar to Qualcomm {QCOM}: both focus on a technology that will improve the use of wireless technology and both have proprietary technology that other companies will need in the future. Calling Valence the Qualcomm of batteries may be premature at this point, but it could be an accurate statement over the next five years.

One of the ways that scam companies gain attention is by mentioning "high flying" companies in their news releases, thereby picking up more eyeballs.

I am neutral on VLNC, but believe this comparison to be hilarious.

Have fun,
Phil