SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Wexler who wrote (5091)11/24/1999 11:30:00 AM
From: Dale Baker  Respond to of 10293
 
Funny how everyone is going nuts over GUMM moving up or down a few points and I just hit OPAY for a 12-point scalp in less time than it takes Dan to write one of his epics.



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (5091)11/24/1999 12:27:00 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd  Respond to of 10293
 
Yes, that's what I've been noting as well. Bought a few of the Jan 40s with the stock at 38, a few of the April 45s with the stock at 42, and looking for a few more opportunities like that.

Volatility premium is shocking low compared even to other large-cap tech stocks, and the market for those options is reasonably fluid.

With a core position entry point just below 20, this could turn out to be one of my biggest winners of the year.

mg



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (5091)11/25/1999 1:42:00 AM
From: ProDeath  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
re: COMS and GUMM

Bill, I've been a bit of a fan of COMS for some time, picked some up early in the year around 22 and sold for a bit of a profit later. Uhhhh, looks like I shoulda held ;-) . But that's not why I write.

I just wanted to thank you for giving the GUMM shills such a complete workout, the kind of conditioning that perhaps could only be improved upon by including a daily helping of Purina Tout Chow in their diets. Your altruism in taking time to help them keep up their promotional skills is truly admirable. For this they should worship and adore you, preferably in some public fashion incorporating self-humiliation.

Whatever else may be true about GUMM, off the top of my head I could name 100 stocks I would invest in before GUMM, and could probably expand that list to several hundred were I to undertake the research.

People's investment goals and opinions differ, but I just don't see why being long in GUMM is so desirable. It certainly does seem like the party is over for the moment.



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (5091)11/25/1999 8:49:00 PM
From: Hank  Respond to of 10293
 
Bill,

Check out this lunacy:

Message 12102261

I think GUMM may be slipping some LSD into those Ziscam bottles. These guys need a straight jacket.

I hope you've had a Happy Thanksgiving.

Hank