Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (42687)	11/24/1999 12:39:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71178

That's good Bill, you're no match for the "slightly overweight" soccer mom squad over here.....<g> bp

To: Bill who wrote (42687)	11/24/1999 1:39:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

what "team" oh do, do tell us- rather than just posting here on and on and on. WHO got JLA suspended? Not IIIII. I asked that his posts cravenly STEALING my posts over to feelies be removed. IF SI suspended him for that it wasn't due to ME. I would never ask anyone- no matter how juvenile, stupid, vindictive and harassing they were- to be suspended. I have said over and over again that I think suspension should only be done for physical threats, extreme intimidation etc etc (although lower thresholds should apply on the stock threads). But of course you live in an alternate universe where everything YOU say is correct. So I suppose none of this will get into that ossified lump of concrete between your ears you call a brain- but just in CASE- NO ONE HERE TRIED TO GET JLA SUSPENDED. OK idiot?