Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Charter off-topic loquacions -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carolyn who wrote (276)	11/24/1999 9:07:00 PM
From: Peach	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 640

Thank you SO much for giving me all the names! I really appreciate your taking the time to do that. It looks like a good time was had by all! Peach

To: Carolyn who wrote (276)	11/27/1999 3:58:00 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 640

OLa Carolina! I put this in CSCO RThread. re: ericy openess: I have been kicked out of this Thread more than one time by suggesting ericy is a good match for CSCO. (I'd love ericy to get rid of their datacom dog) Here in Europe convergence is not between data networks vs voice networks. It's between fixed networks vs mobile networks. Operators will port those users that generate low revenue to mobile networks and put data on top of the wired networks to increase revenue. So, the operators would still be offering public service to that old lady that leaves in the country side and get down to business for the next next gen networks that elmatador keeps druming here. My analysis of Iridium back in 1987 was that Iridium should be low cost voice only service and fixed, ground based newtorks would be used for data. It is going to happen, but not using satellite based networks, it is going to be using GSM. I can't resist tapping my own back: My problem is to be right too early.