Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Frank Coluccio Technology Forum - ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (454)	11/24/1999 5:41:00 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1782

From Inter@ctive Week on Sprint's decision to scrap internal convergence project. zdnet.com

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (454)	11/24/1999 9:40:00 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1782

I got it I guess. You mean the backbone supporting POTS in a given area upstream from another area could not transmit its entire load. The portion of the load that could be maintained was downstream. This probably is independent of any QoS allocation. I had assumed that you were referring to transmission inside a POTS local area which may have a certain topological hierarchy which is lattice dependent. In this case either the calls have to be routed outside of normal ordering or the lattice hierarchy bumps the further out points off the circuit. Have I dreamed up another pile of nonsense?