Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CDN. MOMO PUPPIES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SwampDogg who wrote (15494)	11/26/1999 6:36:00 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36688

If a stock traded 500k in a period and one house traded 100k, do you think that the house could control the trading? LOL. That's the equivalent of asking if Terry Matthews can control the destiny of Newbridge. 20% in one pair of hands is a heck of a hammer.

To: SwampDogg who wrote (15494)	11/26/1999 6:38:00 PM
From: Shaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36688

hey Fud, They have clients buying and selling just like any other house. That 11 mill on the buyside and 12 on the sell over the last couple of weeks isn't 100% for their 'trading' inventory. People seem to have a real hate for CC and all we ever hear about is when 'they' win. What about TOM today??? CC was the largest net seller. There are countless examples of the "train leavin the station" where 'they' lose or miss that train, but nobody ever complains or brings it up. If all the stereotypes/rumours about CC were true they'd be the richest brokerage house in the history of the world. No, I dont work there, never have and probably never will, but I deal with one of the smaller brokerages filled with small cap players and I know what goes on in them. It's nothing like the CC stereotype (and they have been accused of stuff, too). Regards, Dean