SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BigBull who wrote (55506)11/27/1999 2:47:00 PM
From: SargeK  Respond to of 95453
 
Big O/T - Spreading the word on FGH

I just set up a new message board on Quicken. quicken.com

Hope to see you there.

SargeK



To: BigBull who wrote (55506)11/27/1999 5:17:00 PM
From: Gary Burton  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
BB---I didn't say Wolunchuk was wrong. In fact, he will eventually be right in my view. What I said was that after a 5 wave sequence off the Low is complete, a larger retracement occurs. It's purpose is to partially retrace that particular 5 wave upsequence... After the end of such larger retracement, a SECOND 5 wave up sequence should begin that extends beyond the top of the first 5 wave sequence---Think of the first 5 wave sequence as A--the retracement of same as the B--and then the second 5 wave upsequence as the C-----What I am saying is that based on my interpretation of the weekly nymex crude chart, we are very near the end of wave 3 of this FIRST 5 wave sequence and that my guess is that the end of this particular 5 wave sequence will approach 28-30ish. MY sense is that this 5 wave sequence will be completed within the next few weeks. After that, I am looking for a 38%-50% retracement of this entire sequence(that began at approx 10.50ish)--which would target the $20-22 area (ie a retest of the recent hard spike down to near 21)---and THEN the second 5 wave upsequence should likely begin that will take the near month nymex crude futures to beyond 30----say towards 35ish if the second 5 wave sequence was 62% of the length of the first 5 wave sequence. It could even test 40 if C=A.-----As to what will cause the B wave? who knows. Something will come along. Just a hunch, but maybe the realization that Y2K on Jan 1st is not going to disrupt supplies after all? ---- It is obvious that while speculative traders on nymex may rachet up oil futures, investors in the shares are not playing the same game (partly due to the belief that the spike must end and partly due to depressed NG). So, except for NG starting to rise, I think energy shares will continue to languish until we react to near the bottom of the coming B wave in oil. The shares may rise somewhat in the interim due to a turn in NG but likely not to new highs. Only when we retrace in the B will anyone feel sufficiently 'safe' to jump in as I see it......Of course, after new highs in the shares (amidst the C up phase in oil), it will likely be the time to leave "for good" for awhile---my 2c



To: BigBull who wrote (55506)11/27/1999 6:03:00 PM
From: BigBull  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
What?! No Winter Slam?! Gary, shhhhhhhhh, you're gettin' 50% of the gate, man. <g>

Seriously, my interpretation of Wolanchuk's remarks was that if 27 was taken out that 33.45 would be hit without a trip to 20. Do you think HE meant a trip to the low twenties was in order before 33.45? If you do then you guys have the same count. If you don't, you don't.

How about that Naz 3200 call? Blew right through that one. The 2002 date for a major stock market top corresponds PRECISELY with the time period for a spending wave top. Who says E-Wavers can't tell time. <g>

I stand by my call for a major OSX rally to take place after the selloff to 75-80 zone. IMO this will probably be completed within 7 trading days (the sell off, of course). To me this looks like just an ordinary selloff of the initial run. The idea that oil needs to hit 20 before people will buy oil stocks again seems to me to be well ahh a novel idea, at the very least. No sale on that one. The peak will be 120 for the move (the obligatory "within trend" sell offs notwithstanding)

I find it fascinating, from a psychological perspective, to hear such pronouncements like "Everbody knows oil is going back to 20" "Nobody believes this rally is sustainable" "It's just a spike" "It's just a fake Y2K rally" etc. etc. back in the old days when I first began to learn the craft, this was called a "wall of worry." But I'm probably just an ancient old bull who needs to be put out to pasture. I think I'll just kick back and listen to the young and the studly for a while, maybe an old bull can learn new tricks?

Good trading

Bull



To: BigBull who wrote (55506)11/28/1999 10:07:00 PM
From: WTMHouston  Respond to of 95453
 
A lot of grubbers will be jealous that you got message 12121212.

Troy